Contributed Talks: “Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Social Behavior” - CCN 2025

Contributed Talks: “Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Social Behavior” - CCN 2025

🎙 Cognitive Computational Neuroscience 👥 4K 📅 October 8, 2025 ⏱ 54 min 👁 129 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

social behaviorneural mechanismscomputational modelingfMRIreinforcement learning

Summary

This video is a recording of a contributed talks session at the Cognitive Computational Neuroscience Conference 2025 in Amsterdam, focusing on cognitive and neural mechanisms of social behavior. Five researchers present their work. Philippa Johnson discusses using hidden Markov models to identify latent engagement states in mice during a perceptual decision-making task, and how arousal (measured via pupil size) predicts transitions between these states. Dasom Kwon presents a study on neural representation of social relationship graphs, using multi-dimensional valence graphs to model dynamic social interactions in a movie, and shows that these graphs predict brain activity in regions like the TPJ and precuneus. Georgia Turner introduces a computational model of reward learning and habits on social media, applying reinforcement learning to Twitter posting behavior, and finds that a hybrid model of goal-directed and habitual control best explains user behavior. Isaac Ray Christian presents work on hierarchical systems in the default mode network when reasoning about self and other mental states, though the talk is cut off. Manasi Malik’s talk on neural computations underlying social evaluations from visual stimuli is mentioned but not shown. The session includes Q&A segments where speakers clarify their methods and findings.

195 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talks present original research with clear hypotheses and methods. Johnson’s use of hidden Markov models to infer latent states and validate with accuracy is rigorous. Kwon’s incorporation of valence into social graph modeling is innovative and shows improved predictive power. Turner’s application of reinforcement learning to real-world social media data is novel and well-validated with a pre-registered replication. The argumentation is solid, with speakers acknowledging limitations and suggesting future directions. The Q&A sessions add value by clarifying methodological choices.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite specific sources, but the research is presented in a scientific context (CCN conference). The title accurately reflects the content. The talks are based on rigorous methods, and the findings are preliminary but consistent with existing literature. The lack of explicit citations is a minor weakness, but the content is scientifically grounded.

151 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a session of contributed talks on cognitive and neural mechanisms of social behavior.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video presents original research from a reputable conference (CCN 2025), with talks by multiple researchers. The methods are described in detail, and the findings are preliminary but scientifically grounded. No sources are cited in the video, but the content is consistent with current computational neuroscience literature.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The video showcases cutting-edge research in computational neuroscience, with each talk offering novel contributions: Johnson’s use of HMMs to link arousal to engagement transitions, Kwon’s multi-dimensional valence graphs for social relationships, and Turner’s application of RL to social media behavior. These approaches advance our understanding of social cognition and decision-making.

Pour aller plus loin :

78 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores across all dimensions, indicating a well-rounded and scientifically rigorous content. The high technical level and information quality are balanced by a moderate score in novelty, reflecting the incremental nature of the research.

Reliability 8/10