Thanks for a great 2018

Thanks for a great 2018

by Stefan Milo

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Hobbies & Practical WLifestyle, Hobbies and LeisureWNNature and the natural world: general interest
🎙 Stefan Milo 👥 652K 📅 December 31, 2018 ⏱ 10 min 👁 3K 📄 opinion experte 🧭 2026-09-06
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

archaeologyprehistoryStone AgeYouTubechannel update

Summary

Stefan Milo thanks his viewers and collaborators for a successful 2018, during which his channel grew to over 5,000 subscribers. He credits his wife for behind-the-scenes support and acknowledges other YouTube channels (Khanubis, Cogito, Armchair Historian, OSP) for including him in collaborations like Operation Odysseus. He outlines his plans for 2019: two to three videos per month focusing on prehistory, particularly the Stone Age, given his archaeology degree. He also plans monthly interview-style videos with experts on topics he is less familiar with. He aims to blend the formats of Tom Scott and Fantana to create unique, high-quality archaeology content. He emphasizes his desire to make archaeology accessible and relevant to a general audience, focusing on what archaeology reveals about the past rather than archaeological theory. The video ends with a thank-you and a happy new year message.

138 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video’s value lies in its transparency about the channel’s direction and the creator’s background. It provides insight into the motivations and plans of an educational content creator. The argumentation is personal and anecdotal, not scientific, but it is coherent and sincere. The creator clearly explains his niche and why he believes it is underserved, which adds credibility to his plans.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not present scientific content, so there is no scientific rigor to evaluate. The sources mentioned are other YouTube channels, which are appropriate for the context. The title accurately reflects the content. The creator’s credentials (archaeology degree) are mentioned, but no specific sources are cited. The video is a personal update, so the lack of sources is not a flaw, but it limits the scientific value.

144 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a thank-you message for 2018 and a preview of 2019 plans.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video is a personal thank-you and channel update, not a scientific presentation. The creator holds an archaeology degree and discusses his content focus, but provides no new information or sources. The reliability is moderate, as it reflects personal experience and plans.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

  • OSP (Overly Sarcastic Productions) — Mentioned as a collaborator in Operation Odysseus and a source of inspiration.
  • Khanubis — Mentioned as a fellow YouTuber who introduced the creator to the educational content community.

Concurring Sources

  • Khanubis — The creator credits Khanubis for introducing him to the educational content community, which aligns with the collaborative spirit mentioned.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a personal perspective on the growth of an educational YouTube channel and the creator’s strategic plans. It highlights a gap in archaeology content on YouTube: making archaeology accessible to a general audience. The creator’s approach to blend formats from popular creators is an original idea.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Archaeology — Provides an overview of the field and its methods.
  • Prehistory — Contextualizes the Stone Age and other prehistoric periods.
  • Stone Age — Detailed information on the period the creator plans to focus on.

88 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows low scores in quantity of information and technical level, reflecting the video's nature as a personal update rather than an educational piece. The moderate scores in quality and reliability indicate that while the content is sincere and credible, it lacks depth and verifiable sources.

Reliability 6/10