Purpose Statement: Why We Do What We Do?  Part 04. The Lecture Series with Dr. Basu Prasad Subedi.

Purpose Statement: Why We Do What We Do? Part 04. The Lecture Series with Dr. Basu Prasad Subedi.

🎙 Dr. Basu Prasad Subedi 👥 632 📅 November 11, 2025 ⏱ 10 min 👁 117 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

purpose statementresearch questionqualitativequantitativemixed methods

Summary

In this lecture, Dr. Basu Prasad Subedi, Assistant Professor at Kathmandu University School of Education and Research, discusses how to write a purpose statement after identifying the research gap in the statement of the problem. He emphasizes that the purpose statement should be based on the research gap and should guide the methodology. He explains that the choice of action verbs in the purpose statement indicates the research design: exploratory verbs like ’explore’ or ‘unfold’ suggest qualitative research, while verbs like ’examine’, ’test’, ‘relate’, or ‘associate’ indicate quantitative research. For mixed methods, both types of verbs are used. He advises keeping the purpose statement concise, typically a couple of sentences. He then explains the need to convert the purpose statement into research questions, clarifying that research questions are for the researcher, not for participants. He distinguishes between library-based and field-based research questions, emphasizing that most research requires field data. He also notes that quantitative research questions may lead to hypotheses, while qualitative ones do not. The lecture concludes with a preview of the next episode on delimiting the research.

179 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides practical guidance on writing purpose statements and research questions, which is valuable for novice researchers. The argumentation is coherent, linking the purpose statement to the research gap and methodology. However, it lacks depth and does not engage with existing literature or methodological debates, limiting its scholarly value.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The lecture is based on the speaker’s experience but does not cite specific sources or references. The title accurately reflects the content. The presentation is informal and lacks rigorous scientific grounding, though it offers a clear introductory overview.

103 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the purpose statement and its role in research.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The lecture provides a clear, structured overview of writing purpose statements and converting them into research questions, based on the speaker's academic experience. However, it lacks explicit references to literature or methodological sources, and the presentation is informal and introductory.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture offers a practical, step-by-step approach to writing purpose statements and research questions, which is useful for students and early-career researchers. It emphasizes the alignment between purpose, methodology, and research questions.

Pour aller plus loin :

75 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, indicating a balanced but introductory lecture. The highest scores are in information quantity and quality, while technical level is slightly lower, reflecting the basic nature of the content.

Reliability 6/10