25 Math explainers you may enjoy | SoME3 results

25 Math explainers you may enjoy | SoME3 results

Formal & Physical Sciences Mathematics PBMathematics
🎙 3Blue1Brown (Grant Sanderson) 👥 8.6M 📅 October 7, 2023 ⏱ 22 min 👁 643K 📄 news review 🧭 2026-08-28
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

math explainersSoME33Blue1Brownmathematics educationcontest

Summary

In this video, Grant Sanderson (3Blue1Brown) presents the results of the third Summer of Math Exposition (SoME3), a contest encouraging people to create online math explainers. He emphasizes that the goal is not just to pick winners but to foster a wealth of quality math content. He then goes through 25 selected entries, giving brief commentary on what he likes about each. The entries span a wide range of topics, from computer graphics and physics to pure mathematics and number theory. He highlights the importance of targeting specific audiences and the value of diverse presentation styles, including videos, interactive articles, and even a claymation. He discusses the difficulty of judging such varied content and explains the criteria he uses, such as clarity, motivation, and novelty. The video concludes with the announcement of the five winners and several honorable mentions, along with thanks to the organizers, sponsors, and participants.

148 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the SoME3 contest and the landscape of online math education. Grant’s commentary is thoughtful and highlights the strengths of each entry, often explaining why a particular approach works well for a specific audience. He argues that the contest’s success lies not in the winners but in the overall increase in quality math content available online. The argumentation is solid, as he supports his opinions with specific examples and explains his reasoning. He also acknowledges the difficulty of comparing entries across different formats and target audiences, which adds nuance to his evaluations.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is scientifically rigorous in its presentation, with clear explanations and references to the contest entries. The sources cited are the entries themselves, which are linked in the description. The title accurately reflects the content, as it is a review of 25 math explainers. The video does not claim to be an exhaustive or objective ranking but rather a personal selection of noteworthy entries, which is appropriate for the format.

183 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a review of 25 math explainers from the Summer of Math Exposition 3.

Quality & Reliability

9/10

The video is a curated review of contest entries by a well-known mathematics communicator. The content is based on direct evaluation of the entries, and the presentation is clear and well-structured. The channel has a strong reputation for accuracy and educational quality.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • SoME3 Playlist — The playlist contains all video entries, which are the primary sources discussed in the video.

Contribution & Novelties

The video serves as a curated overview of the SoME3 contest, highlighting a diverse range of math explainers. Its main contribution is in showcasing the variety of approaches to math communication and providing a model for evaluating such content. It also promotes the idea of ‘backburner problems’ as a tool for learning and engagement.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Summer of Math Exposition — Wikipedia page about the contest.
  • 3Blue1Brown — Wikipedia page about the channel.
  • Manim (animation software) — Wikipedia page about the animation library.

86 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quality and reliability, with slightly lower scores in quantity and technical depth. This reflects a video that is well-curated and trustworthy, but not extremely dense in technical content, as it is a review rather than a deep dive.

Reliability 9/10

💬 Très positif. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la grande majorité exprime gratitude et enthousiasme envers l'événement et la communauté mathématique, avec des remerciements aux organisateurs et aux participants.