Hearing smell and tasting words: The science of synaesthesia - with Mary Jane Spiller

Hearing smell and tasting words: The science of synaesthesia - with Mary Jane Spiller

🎙 Mary Jane Spiller 👥 1.8M 📅 March 3, 2026 ⏱ 57 min 👁 6K 📄 science communication 🧭 2026-08-03
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

synaesthesiaperceptionsensesbraincognition

Summary

In this Royal Institution lecture, cognitive psychologist Mary Jane Spiller explores synaesthesia, a condition where senses blend, such as seeing colors for letters or tasting words. She begins with interactive questions to the audience, illustrating that some people have consistent color associations for days or numbers, while others do not. Spiller, who herself has time-space synaesthesia, explains that synaesthesia is not a metaphor but a real perceptual experience. She discusses various forms, including grapheme-color, spatial, and time-space synaesthesia, and how synesthetes often have consistent, automatic associations. The talk covers methods to verify synaesthesia, such as the Stroop test and consistency tests, and touches on the neural basis, suggesting hyperconnectivity between brain regions. Spiller also addresses whether synaesthesia confers advantages, like enhanced memory or creativity, and notes that it runs in families. She concludes by emphasizing that synaesthesia reveals the brain’s remarkable flexibility and the diversity of human perception.

148 words

Critical Evaluation

The lecture provides a comprehensive and engaging introduction to synaesthesia, grounded in the speaker’s expertise as a cognitive psychologist and researcher. Spiller effectively uses audience participation to illustrate the phenomenon, making the content accessible while maintaining scientific rigor. She clearly distinguishes between subjective experiences and measurable phenomena, emphasizing the importance of objective tests like the Stroop task to validate synaesthetic experiences. The talk covers a range of synaesthesia types, from grapheme-color to spatial and time-space, and discusses individual differences, such as projector vs. associator synesthetes. The historical context is briefly mentioned, and the speaker touches on potential neural mechanisms, including hyperconnectivity and genetic factors. However, the lecture lacks specific citations to studies, which would strengthen the scientific credibility. The speaker’s personal experience with synaesthesia adds authenticity but also introduces a potential bias, though she maintains a balanced perspective. The discussion of the impact of synaesthesia on cognition is somewhat speculative, but she appropriately frames it as correlational. Overall, the talk is informative and well-structured, suitable for a general audience interested in neuroscience and perception. The interactive elements and visual examples enhance understanding, though the lack of detailed references is a minor weakness. The title accurately reflects the content, and the talk successfully conveys the complexity and fascination of synaesthesia.

209 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which explores synaesthesia through sensory examples and scientific explanations.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

Talk by a cognitive psychologist with PhD on synaesthesia, published in the Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Content is well-structured, based on established research, and includes interactive demonstrations. No citations to specific studies are given, but the speaker's expertise and the institutional setting (Royal Institution) support reliability.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture provides an accessible overview of synaesthesia, highlighting its diversity and the scientific methods used to study it. It emphasizes that synaesthesia is a real perceptual phenomenon, not just metaphorical, and discusses its potential neural basis. The speaker’s personal experience adds a unique perspective.

Pour aller plus loin :

99 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores across all dimensions, indicating a well-rounded and reliable presentation. The lecture excels in providing substantial information and maintaining scientific rigor, with a strong technical level suitable for an interested audience.

Reliability 8/10