Body Brain Waves'25 - Talk by Jana Lieberz

Body Brain Waves'25 - Talk by Jana Lieberz

🎙 Jana Lieberz 👥 23 📅 December 10, 2025 ⏱ 16 min 👁 3 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-18
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

tVNSgastric motilityinteroceptionfood rewardeating behavior

Summary

Jana Lieberz presents her research on the effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) on gastric signals and food reward-related behavior. The study involved healthy participants who underwent four sessions with either left or right tVNS or sham stimulation. Gastric motility was measured using electrogastrography (EGG) before, during, and after a milkshake consumption. Participants rated hunger, satiety, and liking, and completed a bidding task to measure willingness to pay for food. Results showed site-specific effects: right-sided tVNS increased liking and willingness to pay for food, while left-sided tVNS had effects similar to sham or reduced. Gastric power and frequency responses to the milkshake were modulated by tVNS, with right-sided stimulation attenuating the postprandial power increase. Associations between gastric changes and subjective ratings were stronger during tVNS, suggesting improved interoceptive processing. The findings suggest potential therapeutic applications for conditions with impaired interoception, but further research is needed. The talk includes a Q&A session addressing methodological details and limitations.

158 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights into the modulation of gastric signals and food reward by tVNS, a non-invasive neuromodulation technique. The argumentation is solid, based on a well-designed within-subject study with objective physiological measures (EGG) and behavioral outcomes. The presenter clearly explains the rationale, methods, and results, and acknowledges limitations such as the use of a single food type and the preliminary nature of the data. The discussion of site-specific effects and potential mechanisms (e.g., dopaminergic involvement) adds depth. However, the small sample size and lack of control for certain variables (e.g., BMI, age) are not fully addressed in the presentation, which slightly weakens the argumentation.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is generally high, with a clear experimental design and appropriate statistical analyses. The presenter references the current literature on tVNS and interoception, and the results align with existing findings on lateralized effects. However, specific sources are not cited in the talk, and the description provides no links to publications. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a focused presentation of original research. The Q&A session reveals transparency about limitations and future directions, enhancing credibility. Overall, the talk demonstrates a rigorous approach, though the lack of explicit citations in the presentation is a minor weakness.

219 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a scientific talk on the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on gastric signals and food reward.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The talk presents original research with a clear methodology, within-subject design, and statistical analyses. Limitations are acknowledged, but the small sample size and preliminary nature of the results temper the reliability.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The talk presents novel findings on the site-specific effects of tVNS on gastric motility and food reward, suggesting that right-sided stimulation may enhance interoceptive processing and reward-related behavior. This contributes to the understanding of how non-invasive neuromodulation can influence body-brain interactions. The study is among the first to examine the impact of metabolic state on tVNS effects.

Pour aller plus loin :

93 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows balanced scores across dimensions, with slightly higher quality of information and technical level, indicating a scientifically sound presentation with good depth. The lower quantity of information and reliability scores reflect the preliminary nature of the data and limited sample size.

Reliability 7/10