BioML Seminar 4.4 - Shreshth Gandhi on Scaling Perturbation-Trained Single-Cell Foundation Models

BioML Seminar 4.4 - Shreshth Gandhi on Scaling Perturbation-Trained Single-Cell Foundation Models

🎙 Shreshth Gandhi 👥 14K 📅 June 26, 2026 ⏱ 61 min 👁 74 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

single-cellfoundation modelperturbationdrug responsetransformer

Summary

Shreshth Gandhi presents Tahoe-x1, a family of single-cell foundation models scaled to 3 billion parameters, pretrained on 250 million cells including the Tahoe-100M perturbation dataset. The talk covers the generation of the large-scale perturbation data using pooled experiments with genetic demultiplexing, achieving a 50x throughput increase. The model architecture is a transformer with discrete gene and expression tokens, using a masked expression prediction objective. Training optimizations reduced cost to $45k for the 3B model. Applications include predicting gene dependency from CRISPR screens, gene set membership, and perturbation prediction. The model shows improved performance over existing methods on several benchmarks. The talk concludes with lessons on scaling and the vision towards a virtual cell.

113 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides substantial value by presenting a novel large-scale dataset and model, with detailed technical insights into architecture and training. The argumentation is solid, backed by benchmark comparisons against existing models. The speaker transparently discusses limitations, such as the performance gap in zero-shot perturbation prediction. The engineering details, like custom attention kernels and data streaming, add practical value. However, some claims lack external validation, and the talk is a seminar rather than a peer-reviewed presentation.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is high, with clear methodology and evaluation. The speaker references relevant prior work (e.g., scGPT, GeneFormer, scBase, Cell by Gene) and datasets (Cancer Dependency Map, MSigDB). The title accurately reflects the content. No public comments were provided for analysis.

133 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a seminar on scaling perturbation-trained single-cell foundation models, presented by the lead author.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk presents original research with technical depth, including model architecture, training details, and benchmark results. The speaker is a domain expert with relevant industry experience. However, the presentation is a seminar talk without peer-reviewed publication details, and some claims (e.g., cost, performance) are not independently verified.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • scBase — Mentioned as a compilation of publicly available datasets from the Arc Institute.
  • Cell by Gene — Mentioned as a corpus compiled by CZIS.
  • Cancer Dependency Map — Used for CRISPR knockout screens and gene dependency scores.
  • MSigDB — Used for gene set membership benchmarks.

Concurring Sources

  • scGPT — The model architecture is derived from scGPT, and the talk reports improved performance.
  • Geneformer — The model is inspired by Geneformer, and the talk compares performance.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk presents Tahoe-x1, a large-scale single-cell foundation model trained on a unique perturbation dataset, demonstrating improved performance on several downstream tasks. The engineering insights on cost-efficient training are valuable.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • scGPT — A foundational model for single-cell genomics, relevant as a baseline and inspiration.
  • Geneformer — A transformer model for single-cell data, relevant for comparison.
  • Virtual Cell — An initiative towards building a virtual cell, directly related to the talk’s vision.
  • FlashAttention — The attention mechanism used for efficient training, relevant to the engineering discussion.

90 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in technical depth and information quality, with slightly lower scores in accessibility and breadth. This indicates a specialized, in-depth presentation suitable for an expert audience.

Reliability 8/10