Interest Rate Risk & Cross-Section Effects of Micro-Prudential Regulation|The Next Financial Crisis?

Interest Rate Risk & Cross-Section Effects of Micro-Prudential Regulation|The Next Financial Crisis?

🎙 European Central Bank 👥 106K 📅 September 18, 2025 ⏱ 55 min 👁 1K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-06
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

interest rate riskmicro-prudential regulationbank runscross-sectionfinancial stability

Summary

This video is a recording of a session from the 10th ECB Annual Research Conference, held jointly with Stanford’s Hoover Institution, on the theme ‘The Next Financial Crisis?’. The main presentation is by Juliane Begenau, who presents a paper co-authored with Vadim Elenev and Tim Landfor, titled ‘Interest Rate Risk and Cross-Section Effects of Micro-Prudential Regulation’. The paper develops a theoretical model to explain cross-sectional differences in banks’ portfolio and funding choices, particularly regarding interest rate risk and run risk. The model incorporates heterogeneity in banks’ lending and deposit productivity, product differentiation in insured and uninsured deposit markets, and endogenous runs. It is calibrated to US bank data and rationalizes observed patterns such as smaller banks holding more securities and larger banks relying more on uninsured deposits. The model identifies two distinct causes of bank defaults: solvency defaults and run defaults, which vary across the cross-section. The authors then use the model to analyze the cross-sectional effects of micro-prudential policies, finding that size-dependent capital requirements are most effective at reducing run risk with limited side effects. The presentation is followed by comments from discussants Augustin Landier and Markus Brunnermeier, and a brief Q&A session. The video is technical and aimed at an audience familiar with banking and financial regulation.

209 words

Critical Evaluation

The video presents a rigorous academic paper that addresses a timely and important topic: the differential exposure of banks to interest rate risk and run risk, and the implications for micro-prudential regulation. The presentation is well-structured, starting with motivating empirical facts, then laying out a theoretical model, and finally discussing policy implications. The model is sophisticated, incorporating key features such as product differentiation in deposit markets, endogenous runs, and heterogeneity in bank productivity. The calibration to US data adds credibility, and the model appears to replicate important cross-sectional patterns. The discussants provide valuable comments, highlighting potential limitations and extensions. However, the video is a presentation, not a full paper, so some details of the model and its assumptions are not fully explained. The discussion is technical and may be challenging for a general audience. The video does not include a full literature review or a detailed comparison with alternative models. The policy conclusions, while interesting, are based on a specific model and may not be directly generalizable. Overall, the content is of high quality and contributes to the understanding of bank risk and regulation, but it is not a comprehensive review of the literature and should be viewed as a presentation of ongoing research.

204 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the session focuses on interest rate risk and cross-sectional effects of micro-prudential regulation, within the broader conference theme of the next financial crisis.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

Presentation by a recognized academic (Juliane Begenau) at a high-level conference (ECB Annual Research Conference), with formal model and calibration to US data. Discussants are prominent academics. However, the video is a recording of a presentation, not a peer-reviewed publication, and the model's assumptions and simplifications are not fully scrutinized in the video.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The paper contributes a unified framework that jointly rationalizes banks’ portfolio and funding choices, including interest rate risk and run risk, in the cross-section. It distinguishes between solvency and run defaults and shows that size-dependent capital requirements are particularly effective in mitigating run risk. The model is calibrated to US data, providing quantitative insights.

Pour aller plus loin :

95 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantitative information, quality of information, technical level, and global reliability, indicating a technically rigorous and well-sourced presentation. The lower score in adequacy of title is due to the title being slightly sensational, but the content is directly relevant.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.