Linear Programming: Bit Complexity || @ CMU || Lecture 17c of CS Theory Toolkit

Linear Programming: Bit Complexity || @ CMU || Lecture 17c of CS Theory Toolkit

🎙 Ryan O'Donnell 👥 14K 📅 June 2, 2020 ⏱ 24 min 👁 2K 📄 lecture 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

linear programmingbit complexityNPcoNPGaussian elimination

Summary

This lecture, part of CMU’s CS Theory Toolkit, addresses the bit complexity of linear programming. The instructor, Ryan O’Donnell, begins by stating the goal: to show that if a linear program (LP) is feasible, then there exists a feasible solution whose bit length is polynomial in the input size. He introduces the concept of vertices (extreme points) of a polytope and argues that any feasible LP has a vertex solution. However, he notes an issue: LPs without vertices (e.g., unbounded regions) require adding ‘big box constraints’ to ensure a vertex exists. He then demonstrates how to convert a standard-form LP (inequalities) into an equivalent equation-form LP (equalities with non-negativity constraints) using variable splitting and slack variables. After simplifying to full-rank systems, he argues that any feasible equation-form LP has a solution that can be found by solving a square linear system, which can be done in polynomial time via Gaussian elimination, ensuring polynomial bit complexity. He concludes that adding big box constraints does not change feasibility and that the existence of a polynomial-size solution implies LP is in NP ∩ coNP, with a note that it is actually in P.

190 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides a clear and rigorous argument for the bit complexity of linear programming, a fundamental result in theoretical computer science. The instructor builds the proof step by step, addressing potential pitfalls such as the absence of vertices and the need for big box constraints. The argumentation is solid, with each step logically justified. The value lies in the pedagogical clarity and the connection to complexity classes (NP ∩ coNP).

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The lecture is scientifically rigorous, with references to standard textbooks (Matoušek & Gärtner, Grötschel et al.) and a clear explanation of the underlying linear algebra. The title accurately reflects the content. The instructor is a recognized expert, and the course is part of a reputable university program. No external sources are cited beyond the mentioned textbooks and course resources.

145 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a lecture on the bit complexity of linear programming, part of a CS theory course.

Quality & Reliability

9/10

Lecture by a renowned CMU professor, rigorous mathematical exposition, references to standard textbooks, and clear logical progression. Minor simplifications and omissions (e.g., proof of Gaussian elimination bit complexity) are acknowledged.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Understanding and Using Linear Programming — Mentioned as a resource; provides background on LP theory.
  • Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization — Mentioned as a resource; covers combinatorial optimization and LP.

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture provides a self-contained proof that linear programming is in NP ∩ coNP, emphasizing the bit complexity of solutions. It offers a clear pedagogical approach to a fundamental result, connecting linear algebra and complexity theory. The discussion of big box constraints and the conversion to equation form are particularly instructive.

Pour aller plus loin :

96 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality, technical level, and reliability, with slightly lower quantity of information due to the focused scope. This indicates a specialized, rigorous lecture suitable for advanced students.

Reliability 9/10