PHEC 459: How to Tell Better Stories, With Sally Perkins, PhD

PHEC 459: How to Tell Better Stories, With Sally Perkins, PhD

🎙 Dr. Charlotte Hughes Huntley 👥 103 📅 June 2, 2026 ⏱ 36 min 👁 6 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

storytellingpublic healthcommunicationdataadvocacy

Summary

In this episode of the Public Health Epidemiology Conversations podcast, host Dr. Charlotte Huntley interviews Dr. Sally Perkins, a storytelling expert and director of storytelling at Authenticx, a healthcare conversation intelligence company. Dr. Perkins shares practical frameworks for healthcare and public health professionals to improve their storytelling skills. She explains the neuroscience behind why stories are more persuasive than data alone, emphasizing that stories activate multiple brain regions including those involved in decision-making. She introduces the ‘story loop’ structure (normal, problem, intervention, new normal) and distinguishes between ’tree tales’ (individual stories) and ‘forest stories’ (population-level narratives with data). She illustrates how to weave tree tales into forest stories using a vaccination example. The episode also covers Dr. Perkins’ book ‘From Story to Action’ and provides actionable advice for professionals to start practicing storytelling immediately. The conversation highlights the importance of moving from individual anecdotes to population-level data to effectively persuade diverse audiences.

152 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The episode provides valuable, actionable frameworks for storytelling in public health. Dr. Perkins’ argumentation is solid, grounded in her extensive experience and supported by references to neuroscience findings. She clearly explains the story loop and the distinction between tree tales and forest stories, offering concrete examples. The value lies in the practical application: professionals can immediately use these frameworks to improve their communication with patients, legislators, and communities. The argumentation is persuasive, emphasizing that storytelling is not optional but essential for effective public health advocacy.

94 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on improving storytelling skills for public health professionals.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The episode features an expert in storytelling with a PhD in rhetoric and communication, and practical experience in healthcare. The content is based on established frameworks and neuroscience findings, but lacks direct citations to specific studies. The information is presented as expert opinion rather than peer-reviewed evidence.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • PHEC Podcast Community — Mentioned as a resource for joining the podcast community.
  • PHEC Podcast Show Notes — Mentioned as a resource for show notes and additional information.
  • DrCHHuntley Consulting — Mentioned as a resource for consulting services.

Concurring Sources

  • CDC Health Communication — CDC's health communication resources align with the episode's emphasis on effective communication in public health.

Contribution & Novelties

The episode offers a fresh perspective on the importance of storytelling in public health, providing simple yet powerful frameworks that are immediately applicable. It bridges the gap between individual anecdotes and population-level data, which is a common challenge in the field. The ’tree tale’ and ‘forest story’ distinction is a novel contribution that helps professionals tailor their communication to different audiences.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Storytelling in Public Health — CDC resource on using stories in health communication.
  • The Science of Storytelling — Psychology Today blog exploring the psychology behind storytelling.
  • Narrative Persuasion — Wikipedia article on narrative persuasion, a key concept in the episode.

106 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information and reliability, reflecting the expert's credibility and practical advice. The lower score in technical level indicates that the content is accessible to a broad audience without requiring specialized knowledge. The overall balance suggests a well-rounded episode that is both informative and actionable.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.