Every major leap in human progress has this in common | Jason Crawford: Full Interview

Every major leap in human progress has this in common | Jason Crawford: Full Interview

by Jason Crawford

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Society & Culture JBCCCultural studiesJBCC9History of ideas
🎙 Jason Crawford 👥 8.9M 📅 November 19, 2025 ⏱ 41 min 👁 34K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-03
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

progressinnovationFrancis BaconIndustrial Revolutionphilosophy of progress

Summary

In this interview, Jason Crawford, founder of the Roots of Progress Institute, discusses the philosophy and history of human progress. He argues that progress is not automatic but results from deliberate choice and effort. He traces the idea of progress from its absence in most of human history to its emergence in the West during the modern period, highlighting Francis Bacon’s role in advocating for empirical science and the possibility of surpassing ancient achievements. Crawford describes how the Industrial Revolution and subsequent technological advancements validated Bacon’s vision, leading to widespread optimism by the 19th century. However, the world wars of the 20th century shattered naive beliefs in automatic moral and social progress, leading to skepticism and fear of technology. He acknowledges the real costs and risks of progress, such as environmental damage and safety hazards, but argues that these should be addressed rather than used to reject progress altogether. He emphasizes that material progress supports spiritual and human flourishing, and that we must believe in progress to continue making it happen. The interview covers various domains of progress, including agriculture, energy, medicine, and transportation, and discusses the acceleration of progress and potential slowdowns due to regulatory and cultural factors.

199 words

Critical Evaluation

The interview offers a compelling and well-structured argument for the importance of progress, grounded in historical analysis and philosophical reflection. Crawford’s expertise in the tech industry and his role at the Roots of Progress Institute lend credibility to his perspective. He effectively uses historical examples, such as the printing press and the Industrial Revolution, to illustrate his points, and he references influential thinkers like Francis Bacon and economic historians like Joel Mokyr. However, the argumentation is largely qualitative and lacks empirical data or specific citations to scientific studies, which limits its scientific rigor. The discussion of the costs and risks of progress is balanced, acknowledging environmental and social concerns, but it does not delve deeply into potential solutions or alternative frameworks. The title accurately reflects the content, and the interview provides a thoughtful exploration of the philosophy of progress, though it may not offer novel insights for those already familiar with the topic. The presence of a brief sponsorship segment is noted but does not detract from the content. Overall, the interview is informative and thought-provoking, but its reliance on opinion and historical narrative rather than quantitative evidence prevents it from being a definitive scientific analysis.

196 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the central theme of the interview, which explores the common drivers behind major leaps in human progress, emphasizing choice, effort, and belief.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The interview presents a coherent historical and philosophical narrative on the idea of progress, supported by references to key figures like Francis Bacon and economic historians like Joel Mokyr. However, it lacks direct citations to specific studies or data, and the argumentation is primarily opinion-based rather than empirically grounded.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Big Think Membership — Promotional link for Big Think membership, mentioned at the beginning of the video.
  • The Philosophy of Progress (Transcript) — Official transcript of the interview, providing additional context and references.
  • We are living through a slowdown in human progress | Jason Crawford — Related video on the same topic, suggested as an up next.

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • Comment on the video — Some commenters argue that progress has been exploited for corporate profits and that moral progress is more fundamental, challenging Crawford's techno-optimism.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The interview provides a synthesis of historical and philosophical perspectives on progress, emphasizing the role of human agency and belief. It offers a clear narrative from Bacon to the Industrial Revolution and the 20th-century disillusionment, framing progress as a choice rather than an inevitability. The discussion of the slowdown in progress and the need for a new philosophy of progress is timely, especially in the context of AI debates.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • The Idea of Progress — Wikipedia overview of the concept’s history.
  • Francis Bacon — Biography and contributions to the scientific method.
  • Joel Mokyr — Economic historian whose work on the Industrial Revolution is referenced.

108 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and reliability, reflecting the interview's comprehensive historical coverage and Crawford's expertise. However, the technical level is moderate, as the discussion is accessible and lacks deep technical detail. The quality of information is strong but not exceptional due to the absence of empirical data.

Reliability 7/10

💬 The comment section is predominantly positive, with many viewers appreciating the historical and philosophical depth of the interview. However, there is a notable minority expressing skepticism about the ethics of progress and its alignment with corporate interests, creating a balanced but slightly critical tone. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la majorité salue la clarté et la profondeur de l'analyse, tandis qu'une partie critique l'absence de considérations économiques et morales.