WEBINAR

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides valuable insights into the draft Code of Conduct, offering a balanced examination of its strengths and weaknesses. The panelists’ arguments are well-structured and grounded in their extensive experience in ISDS. Mr. von Walter’s argument for a permanent court is compelling, while Prof. Crook’s caution about unintended consequences is equally persuasive. The discussion effectively highlights the complexities of reforming ISDS and the trade-offs involved. The value lies in the expert perspectives and the nuanced understanding of the issues, making it a useful resource for those interested in ISDS reform.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The webinar demonstrates high scientific rigor, with panelists citing their own publications and institutional reports. The sources mentioned include the draft code itself, UNCITRAL Working Group III documents, and academic articles. The title ‘WEBINAR’ is generic and does not convey the specific topic, but the description provides the full title. The content aligns well with the described topic. The panelists’ credentials lend credibility to the discussion, and the webinar is co-sponsored by reputable organizations.

The title 'WEBINAR' is generic and does not reflect the specific topic, but the description provides the full title. The content matches the described topic.

8/10

The webinar features highly qualified experts in ISDS, including academics, practitioners, and government representatives. The discussion is balanced, presenting multiple perspectives on the draft Code of Conduct. The content is based on expert knowledge and direct involvement in the negotiation process, lending high credibility. However, as a webinar, it is not peer-reviewed and represents the opinions of the panelists.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 00:00Introduction by moderator Hélène Ruiz Fabri, outlining the webinar's structure and topic.
• 03:00Prof. Chiara Giorgetti presents an overview of the draft Code of Conduct, its structure, and key provisions.
• 10:00Discussion on the code's flexibility and bracketed texts, allowing for policy choices by states.
• 20:00Mr. André von Walter gives a general comment, supporting the code but advocating for a multilateral court.
• 30:00Prof. John Crook offers a contrasting perspective, highlighting ripe and unripe aspects of the code.
• 40:00Panelists discuss the issue of multiple roles and the potential impact on arbitrator diversity.
• 50:00Q&A session begins, with questions from attendees on enforcement and implementation.
• 1:00:00Further discussion on the role of disclosure and challenges in the current system.
• 1:10:00Panelists summarize their positions and reflect on the future of ISDS reform.
• 1:20:00Concluding remarks by the moderator, thanking participants and closing the webinar.

• Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in Investor-State Dispute Settlement — The draft code is the central subject of the webinar, discussed in detail by panelists.
• UNCITRAL Working Group III — The reform process in which the code is being negotiated.
• ICSID — One of the secretariats that prepared the draft code.

• Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in Investor-State Dispute Settlement — The draft code itself, which the panelists discuss and analyze.

• EU's proposal for a multilateral investment court — Mr. von Walter argues that a code of conduct alone is insufficient and advocates for a permanent court, which contrasts with the more incremental approach of the draft code.