Seminario de inv., Estudios sociales e históricos de la cuantificación social 2o ciclo 2025 sesión 7

Seminario de inv., Estudios sociales e históricos de la cuantificación social 2o ciclo 2025 sesión 7

🎙 Gabriela Sued 👥 4K 📅 October 20, 2025 ⏱ 118 min 👁 61 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

dataficationpost-demographicsgenderpovertyalgorithms

Summary

In this seminar session, Gabriela Sued discusses the intersection of datafication, gender, and poverty, drawing on her research and the concept of post-demographics. She introduces the idea that platforms act as post-demographic machines, creating emergent categories based on aggregated data rather than traditional demographic attributes. She explores how gender and class are constructed in digital environments, highlighting that while categories may seem dissolved, they persist in new forms. She presents her work on algorithmic visibility in digital feminism, showing how women have agency to inscribe their own political gender categories online. She also touches on the datafication of poverty, referencing a study on Colombia’s SISBEN system. The talk bridges historical and social studies of quantification with contemporary digital issues, emphasizing the power dynamics and inequalities embedded in algorithmic processes.

129 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights into how datafication and algorithmic processes reshape social categories, particularly gender and class. Sued’s argumentation is coherent, building from theoretical concepts like post-demographics to concrete examples from her research and other studies. She effectively illustrates the shift from traditional demographic classification to emergent algorithmic profiling, and she critically examines the implications for inequality and agency. However, the argumentation sometimes relies on anecdotal examples and personal observations rather than systematic evidence, and the discussion of poverty is less developed than that of gender.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

Sued demonstrates scientific rigor by grounding her talk in academic literature, including her own published work and that of others like Richard Rogers and López Solano. She clearly distinguishes between her own research and external sources. The title of the video is accurate but generic, not highlighting the specific content. The talk is well-structured and references relevant studies, though it lacks explicit citations for some claims. The adequacy between title and content is acceptable, as the title indicates the seminar series and session, which is appropriate for an academic seminar.

192 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately describes the seminar session, indicating the series and session number, though it does not mention the specific topic of data, gender, and inequalities.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speaker is a postdoctoral researcher with relevant expertise, and the talk is grounded in her own research and cited academic work. However, it is a seminar presentation with limited external verification of claims, and some concepts are presented without deep critical analysis.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Visibilidades algorítmicas en el feminismo digital — One of the two texts by the speaker that she discusses, focusing on algorithmic visibility and digital feminism.
  • Text on SISBEN system in Colombia — A text by López Solano that she mentions as a reading for the session, illustrating how classification systems decide access to state resources.

Concurring Sources

  • Richard Rogers - Digital Methods — The concept of post-demographics is attributed to Richard Rogers, a professor at the University of Amsterdam.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk offers a novel perspective by connecting historical and social studies of quantification with contemporary digital data practices, specifically through the lens of post-demographics. It contributes to understanding how gender and class are reconfigured in algorithmic systems, and it highlights the potential for agency through collective feminist action online. The discussion of poverty and datafication adds to the critical analysis of how digital systems can perpetuate inequalities.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Datafication — Overview of the concept and its implications.
  • Algorithmic bias — Related to the biases in algorithmic profiling discussed.
  • Digital feminism — Context for the discussion of feminist activism online.

104 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and fiability, with moderate scores in quality and technical level. This indicates a talk that is rich in content and generally reliable, but with some limitations in depth and technical rigor.

Reliability 7/10