Vibe Coding Your First LLM End-to-End Application

Vibe Coding Your First LLM End-to-End Application

🎙 Greg Loughnane & Chris Alexiuk 👥 5K 📅 October 23, 2025 ⏱ 50 min 👁 52 📄 workshop 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

context engineeringresponses APIRAGagentsvibe coding

Summary

This workshop, recorded at MLOps World 2025, introduces the concept of ‘vibe coding’ and context engineering for building LLM applications. The speakers, Greg Loughnane and Chris Alexiuk, guide attendees through the evolution from prompt engineering to context engineering, emphasizing the importance of managing context dynamically. They cover the OpenAI Responses API, its advantages over the older Chat Completions API, and its role in building agentic systems. The session includes live coding demonstrations, showing how to use tools like Cursor and Claude CLI for AI-assisted development. They discuss the integration of RAG, MCP connectors, and agentic search, and highlight the modern LLM developer stack including OpenAI, uv, Vercel, and React. The workshop aims to equip developers with practical skills to build, ship, and share production-ready LLM applications, with a strong emphasis on community and practical ROI.

135 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The workshop provides valuable, up-to-date information on building LLM applications, particularly the shift from prompt engineering to context engineering. The speakers argue convincingly that context engineering is the next evolution, and they support this with examples and references to recent developments like the Responses API. The argumentation is solid, grounded in practical experience, and they acknowledge the fast-paced nature of the field. However, some claims are promotional, and the workshop is more of a tutorial than a critical analysis.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate; the content is based on the speakers’ expertise and current industry practices, but not on peer-reviewed research. They reference the GPT-3 paper and other foundational works, but the primary sources are OpenAI documentation and their own experience. The title accurately reflects the content, and the workshop is well-structured. The description provides a link to MLOps World, but no additional sources are cited.

161 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a workshop on vibe-coding an LLM application end-to-end, covering context engineering, RAG, agents, and deployment.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The workshop provides practical, hands-on guidance on building LLM applications, with a focus on context engineering and modern tools. The speakers are experienced practitioners, and the content is up-to-date (2025). However, it is a workshop, not a peer-reviewed source, and some claims are promotional.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • MLOps World — Conference where the workshop was recorded

Concurring Sources

  • OpenAI Responses API documentation — Official documentation for the API discussed in the workshop

Contribution & Novelties

The workshop provides a practical, hands-on approach to building LLM applications, emphasizing context engineering as a key skill. It offers a clear framework for developers to move from simple prompting to building production-ready applications with RAG and agents. The live coding examples and focus on modern tools like Cursor and Claude CLI are particularly valuable for practitioners.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Context Engineering — Wikipedia article on prompt engineering, which is the foundation of context engineering.
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) — Wikipedia section on RAG, a key technique discussed in the workshop.
  • OpenAI Responses API — Official documentation for the Responses API, which is central to the workshop.

108 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced performance across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quantity and technical level, indicating a content-rich workshop with practical depth. The lower scores in information quality and reliability reflect the promotional nature and lack of peer-reviewed sources.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.