Generación Leonardo: “Nuestra literatura nace tras una ardua labor de investigación no académica”

Generación Leonardo: “Nuestra literatura nace tras una ardua labor de investigación no académica”

🎙 Fundación BBVA 👥 20K 📅 December 18, 2025 ⏱ 58 min 👁 195 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-06
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

literaturainvestigación no académicaciencias socialescreación literariabecas Leonardo

Summary

The video is a roundtable discussion held at Fundación BBVA’s Madrid headquarters on November 3, featuring writers Esther F. Carrodeguas, Mar Gómez Glez, Isaac Rosa, and David Uclés, moderated by journalist Luis Alemany. The conversation centers on the intersection of literature and social sciences, exploring how the authors integrate research into their creative work. Each writer describes their Leonardo grant project: Carrodeguas investigates the mothers of drug addicts in Galicia and their social struggles; Gómez Glez develops a dystopian novel about a society where people cannot receive money; Rosa writes a novel about love in contemporary times; Uclés researches the Spanish Civil War for his novel ‘La Península de las Casas vacías’. They discuss the permeable boundary between artistic creation and academic research, emphasizing that their work is grounded in extensive non-academic investigation. The writers reflect on the importance of tradition, the need for time and dedication, and the hybrid nature of their projects. They also debate whether excessive social science can hinder artistic expression, concluding that literature and theater are broad enough to accommodate various approaches. The discussion highlights the value of the Leonardo grants in supporting mid-career creators and fostering interdisciplinary exchange.

194 words

Critical Evaluation

The video offers a thoughtful and nuanced exploration of the relationship between literary creation and social science research. The participants, all accomplished writers, provide personal insights into their methodologies, emphasizing the importance of non-academic research in grounding their narratives. The discussion is well-moderated, allowing each author to articulate their unique perspective while maintaining a coherent thematic thread. The argumentation is solid, as the writers draw on concrete examples from their own projects, such as Carrodeguas’s investigation into the mothers of drug addicts and Uclés’s fieldwork for his Civil War novel. The quality of information is high, though it is primarily anecdotal and opinion-based rather than empirically rigorous. The sources cited are limited to the writers’ own works and the Leonardo grants program, which is appropriate for a discussion of this nature. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video successfully conveys the idea that literary creation often involves a deep, albeit non-academic, research process. The main weakness is the lack of external references or data to support broader claims, but this is not a significant drawback given the format. Overall, the video is a valuable resource for understanding the creative process of contemporary Spanish writers and the role of institutional support in fostering interdisciplinary work.

206 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the core theme of the video: the writers' emphasis on non-academic research as foundational to their literary work.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video features four established writers discussing their creative processes and the role of research in their work, moderated by a journalist. The discussion is reflective and grounded in personal experience, with no factual claims that require verification. The institutional context (Fundación BBVA) adds credibility, but the content is primarily opinion-based, limiting its scientific reliability.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Fundación BBVA — Institutional source supporting the existence and goals of the Leonardo grants.

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a unique insight into the creative processes of four contemporary Spanish writers, highlighting the often-overlooked role of non-academic research in literary creation. It bridges the gap between artistic practice and social science, offering a nuanced perspective on how these fields inform each other. The discussion also sheds light on the impact of the Leonardo grants in supporting mid-career creators, which is a valuable contribution to understanding arts funding.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Adorno’s aesthetic theory — Relevant to the discussion of art’s relationship to society.
  • Mothers of Plaza de Mayo — Referenced by Carrodeguas as an example of grassroots social movements.
  • Spanish Civil War literature — Context for Uclés’s novel and the broader literary tradition.

119 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information and reliability, reflecting the credibility of the speakers and the institutional backing. The quantity of information is moderate, as the discussion is focused and not exhaustive. The technical level is lower, indicating that the content is accessible to a general audience interested in literature and culture.

Reliability 8/10