Laudatory speech by Prof. Richard Kerridge

Laudatory speech by Prof. Richard Kerridge

🎙 Prof. Richard Kerridge 👥 20K 📅 February 6, 2026 ⏱ 15 min 👁 73 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-06
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

environmental humanitiespost-structuralismextinctionentanglementUmwelt

Summary

In this laudatory speech, Prof. Richard Kerridge introduces Thom van Dooren as the recipient of the 7th Biophilia Award. He highlights van Dooren’s contributions to the environmental humanities, particularly his integration of post-structuralist theory with ecological studies. Kerridge explains van Dooren’s key insight that entities are always discursive, formed by networks of relations, and traces this idea back to early ecology and the concept of the ecosystem. He praises van Dooren’s accessible writing style, which bridges academic and public understanding, and his focus on entanglement as a central concept. Kerridge discusses van Dooren’s books, including ‘Flightways’, ‘The Wake of Crows’, and ‘A World in a Shell’, and illustrates his approach with examples like the Hawaiian snails and vultures in India. He emphasizes that extinction is not a singular event but a slow unraveling of entangled ways of life, and that each loss diminishes the world’s unique ways of experiencing it. The speech concludes by thanking van Dooren for his vivid and accessible work.

163 words

Critical Evaluation

The speech is a masterful example of academic laudation, blending biographical accuracy with a clear exposition of the laureate’s theoretical contributions. Kerridge effectively situates van Dooren’s work within the broader context of the environmental humanities, tracing its intellectual lineage from early ecology through post-structuralism. The argument is coherent and well-supported, with references to specific concepts such as the ‘metaphysics of presence’ and ‘Umwelt’, and to van Dooren’s publications. The speech’s strength lies in its ability to make complex theoretical ideas accessible without oversimplifying them, which mirrors van Dooren’s own approach. However, as a laudatory speech, it is inherently uncritical; it does not engage with potential critiques of van Dooren’s work, such as the risk of anthropomorphism or the practical limitations of applying post-structuralist theory to conservation. The sources cited are primarily van Dooren’s own books and a few theorists (Barad, Morton, von Uexküll), which are appropriate but not exhaustive. The speech’s rhetorical structure is effective, building a case for van Dooren’s significance while also conveying the urgency of extinction. The title accurately reflects the content, and the speech fulfills its purpose of honoring the laureate. Overall, it is a high-quality, informative, and engaging piece, though its uncritical nature and limited scope prevent it from being a comprehensive scholarly analysis.

209 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a laudatory speech introducing and praising the work of Thom van Dooren.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speech is a well-structured laudatory address by a senior academic, providing accurate biographical details and a coherent exposition of the laureate's theoretical contributions. It is grounded in established concepts (post-structuralism, Umwelt, entanglement) and references specific publications. However, it is an opinion piece, not peer-reviewed, and lacks critical engagement with potential limitations of the work.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • Critique of post-structuralist approaches in ecology — Some scholars argue that post-structuralist theory may overemphasize discourse at the expense of material reality, a potential critique not addressed in the speech.

Contribution & Novelties

The speech provides a clear synthesis of Thom van Dooren’s contributions to the environmental humanities, particularly his application of post-structuralist theory to extinction studies. It highlights the concept of ‘material-discursive’ and the importance of entanglement, offering a framework for understanding extinction as a slow unraveling of relationships. The speech also emphasizes the role of narrative in bridging academic and public understanding, which is a key innovation in van Dooren’s work.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Environmental humanities — Provides an overview of the interdisciplinary field.
  • Post-structuralism — Explains the theoretical background of van Dooren’s approach.
  • Umwelt — Concept introduced by Jakob von Uexküll, central to understanding species-specific experiences.
  • Multispecies ethnography — Related methodology in anthropology.
  • Extinction studies — Emerging field focusing on the cultural and philosophical aspects of extinction.

129 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information and reliability, reflecting the speech's solid academic grounding. The quantity of information is moderate, as it is a focused laudatory address rather than a comprehensive review. The technical level is moderate, making it accessible to a broad audience.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.