71. Actualizamos OpenClaw, de multiagentes va la cosa

71. Actualizamos OpenClaw, de multiagentes va la cosa

🎙 Horizonte Artificial 👥 252 📅 May 7, 2026 ⏱ 49 min 👁 24 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

OpenClawmulti-agentLLMautomationAI workflow

Summary

In this episode of Horizonte Artificial, hosts Guaica and Joaquín are joined by Sergio Navas to discuss their recent experiences with OpenClaw, an AI agent framework. They focus on the growing trend of multi-agent systems, where multiple AI agents with distinct roles collaborate to accomplish tasks. Sergio describes his virtual team of agents named Rebeca, Nico, and Kentaro, each assigned to different LLMs (GPT-5.5, GLM 5.1, DeepSeek, Kimi) based on task requirements. Joaquín shares his newly set up system with agents Jarvis, Vulcano, and Atenea. They also mention Paperclip as an alternative orchestration tool. The conversation covers practical aspects such as subscription costs (ChatGPT, Codex, Anthropic, Oyama Pro), automating social media posts using N8n and Buffer, and the ideal hardware setup (a mini PC running Ubuntu Server accessed via SSH). They touch on rumors about OpenAI’s smartphone project with Jony Ive. A notable anecdote involves resolving a Time Machine issue using Codex. The hosts reflect on the technical barrier that still exists for many users and speculate about future specialized agents for various life domains.

175 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in the practical, hands-on insights from experienced users. They provide concrete examples of how multi-agent systems can be configured and used for real-world tasks, such as automating social media posts and generating reports. The argumentation is based on personal experience rather than formal evidence, but the hosts are transparent about their successes and failures. They emphasize the efficiency gains and the learning curve, making the content useful for practitioners considering similar setups.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate; the discussion is anecdotal and lacks citations to official documentation or research. The hosts mention specific tools and models, but no sources are provided in the description beyond a Telegram link. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on OpenClaw updates and multi-agent systems. The lack of formal sources reduces the overall reliability, but the practical experience shared adds credibility.

158 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: an update on OpenClaw and a focus on multi-agent systems.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The hosts are practitioners with hands-on experience, but the discussion is anecdotal and lacks formal verification or citations. Claims about model capabilities and costs are plausible but not independently verified.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The episode provides a practical, real-world perspective on using multi-agent systems with OpenClaw, offering insights into configuration, cost management, and automation. It highlights the benefits of assigning different LLMs to specialized agents and using orchestration tools like Paperclip. The hosts share concrete examples of automating social media and generating reports, which can inspire others to adopt similar workflows.

Pour aller plus loin :

127 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the rich practical details shared. Technical level is moderate, indicating the content is accessible to intermediate users. Reliability is slightly lower due to the anecdotal nature and lack of formal citations.

Reliability 6/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.