Writing a Lit Review Parts III and IV

Writing a Lit Review Parts III and IV

by Patrick M Whitehead

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Language & Linguistics CBLanguage: reference and generalCBWWriting and editing guides
🎙 Patrick M Whitehead 👥 192 📅 July 21, 2026 ⏱ 21 min 👁 14 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

literature reviewoutlineacademic writingresearch processstudent voice

Summary

In this tutorial, Patrick M Whitehead walks through the process of writing a literature review, focusing on the steps after gathering sources. He demonstrates how he reads peer-reviewed resources, extracts relevant quotes and information, and organizes them into an outline. He emphasizes the importance of reading beyond abstracts and summaries to find specific findings. He then shows how he structures the outline into a coherent essay, with sections addressing the problem, examples, and implications. He discusses the balance of sections and the importance of a strong conclusion. He also mentions that he will later compare his process with an AI-assisted approach. The video is aimed at students and early-career academics, providing practical advice on managing the writing process.

118 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the practical process of writing a literature review, including the importance of reading primary sources and organizing information. The argumentation is based on the author’s personal experience, which is credible but not empirically validated. The step-by-step demonstration is clear and actionable, making it useful for students. However, the lack of formal sources or references limits its academic rigor.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video demonstrates a rigorous approach to source handling, with the author showing how he extracts quotes and cites sources. However, he does not provide formal citations in the video itself, and the sources he mentions are not listed. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a tutorial on writing a literature review. The video is well-structured and the author is transparent about his methods.

145 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which covers the later stages of writing a literature review.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a practical tutorial by an academic, demonstrating a personal process for writing a literature review. It is transparent about methods and limitations, but lacks formal citations or peer review.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

  • Student-Focused Research in Education Programming — A book edited by the author, used as a source for the literature review.
  • Perceptions of Healthcare Design — A study mentioned but not used in the final review.
  • General Education Essentials — A book used as an example of general education curriculum.

Concurring Sources

  • Student-Focused Research in Education Programming — The author's own book, which aligns with the video's focus on student voice.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a practical, step-by-step guide to writing a literature review, emphasizing the importance of reading primary sources and organizing information. It provides a unique perspective by showing the author’s personal process, including the challenges and time involved. The video is particularly useful for students and early-career academics.

Pour aller plus loin :

81 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced performance across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quality and reliability, reflecting the author's expertise and transparent methodology.

Reliability 7/10