Truth, Facts and Contradiction - Ep. 4.6: The Sorites paradox

Truth, Facts and Contradiction - Ep. 4.6: The Sorites paradox

🎙 Graham Priest 👥 5K 📅 June 26, 2020 ⏱ 10 min 👁 474 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Sorites paradoxdialetheismvaguenessexistenceborderline cases

Summary

In this episode of ‘Truth, Facts and Contradiction’, Professor Graham Priest discusses the Sorites paradox and its implications for dialetheism, the view that some contradictions are true. He begins by explaining the paradox using the example of sobriety: if one is sober, drinking one cc of alcohol preserves sobriety, leading to the absurd conclusion that one remains sober after consuming large amounts. He then introduces the concept of tolerance and borderline cases, where predicates like ‘drunk’ or ‘red’ are vague. Priest contrasts two symmetric solutions: the gap solution (neither true nor false) and the glut solution (both true and false), the latter being the dialetheist approach. He illustrates with a color spectrum example. Turning to existence, Priest argues that existence can come in degrees, as with life and death, which are gradual processes. If one accepts a dialetheist solution to the Sorites, then there can be contradictions concerning concrete entities in borderline areas, such as a person being both alive and dead during the transition. He concludes that this shows a conceptual possibility for existential dialetheism.

176 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the Sorites paradox and its connection to dialetheism, a topic not widely covered in introductory philosophy. Priest’s argumentation is clear and logically structured, using intuitive examples to illustrate abstract concepts. He effectively demonstrates how the paradox applies to existence, offering a novel perspective. However, the discussion is brief and does not delve into objections or alternative solutions in depth, limiting its comprehensiveness.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is a lecture by Graham Priest, a renowned philosopher, lending it high scientific rigor. However, it does not cite specific sources or references, relying on the speaker’s expertise. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on the Sorites paradox within the series on truth and contradiction. The discussion is philosophically sound, but the lack of citations and the informal setting may reduce its perceived reliability for some viewers.

153 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the Sorites paradox within a series on truth, facts, and contradiction.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video features Graham Priest, a leading philosopher of logic, discussing the Sorites paradox and its implications for dialetheism. The content is philosophically rigorous, but as a lecture/discussion, it lacks formal citations and empirical data, relying on expert authority and logical argumentation.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • Classical logic and the principle of bivalence — Classical logicians reject dialetheism and would argue that the Sorites paradox should be solved by denying tolerance or adopting a supervaluationist approach, which contradicts the video's suggestion of glut solutions.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a concise and accessible introduction to the Sorites paradox and its connection to dialetheism, particularly focusing on the less-discussed application to existence. It provides a clear explanation of the gap and glut solutions and their symmetry. The discussion is valuable for students and enthusiasts of philosophy of logic.

Pour aller plus loin :

100 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information, technical level, and reliability, indicating a technically rigorous and reliable source. The quantity of information is moderate, reflecting the video's concise length. Overall, the profile suggests a high-quality educational resource for those interested in advanced philosophical topics.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.