Francesco Berto - “Tis an establish’d maxim in metaphysics..”

Francesco Berto - “Tis an establish’d maxim in metaphysics..”

🎙 Francesco Berto 👥 5K 📅 April 14, 2020 ⏱ 39 min 👁 1K 📄 lecture 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

conceivabilitypossibilityimaginationmental representationHume's principle

Summary

In this lecture, Francesco Berto examines Hume’s principle that conceivability is a guide to possibility, focusing on the distinction between conceiving and imagining. He discusses the role of mental representations, including pictorial and linguistic components, and considers objections from philosophers like Kant and Wittgenstein. Berto argues that a dual-coding theory of mental representation can help defend Hume’s principle against counterexamples, such as imagining impossible mathematical scenarios. He also explores the idea that some apparent conceivings of impossibilities are actually confused or involve stipulations. The talk engages with contemporary debates in modal epistemology and offers a nuanced defense of the principle, while acknowledging its limitations.

104 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides a valuable overview of the conceivability-possibility principle and its challenges. Berto’s argumentation is rigorous, drawing on historical and contemporary sources, and he carefully distinguishes between different types of mental representation. He addresses key objections and offers a plausible defense based on dual-coding theory. The discussion is well-structured and contributes to the ongoing debate in modal epistemology.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

Berto demonstrates scholarly rigor by referencing Hume, Kant, Wittgenstein, and contemporary philosophers. He engages with the literature and presents his own research. The title accurately reflects the content, as the talk centers on Hume’s maxim. The sources are appropriate for an academic lecture, though not all are explicitly cited in the transcript.

126 words

Title / Content Match

The title quotes Hume's maxim, which is the central topic of the talk, accurately reflecting the content.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

Lecture by a recognized expert in modal epistemology, based on his own research and engagement with historical and contemporary sources. The argument is structured and references key figures (Hume, Kant, Wittgenstein, etc.), though it is a presentation rather than a peer-reviewed publication.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Hume's Treatise of Human Nature — Berto discusses Hume's principle from this work.
  • Kant's Critique of Pure Reason — Kant's example of the chiliagon is referenced.
  • Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus — Wittgenstein's views on meaning and contradiction are mentioned.

Concurring Sources

  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Conceivability — Provides background on the principle and its challenges.

Dissenting Sources

  • Yablo, P. (1993). Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility? — Yablo offers a different account of conceivability that may not align with Berto's defense.

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture offers a novel defense of Hume’s principle by integrating dual-coding theory of mental representation. Berto argues that the distinction between pictorial and linguistic representation can resolve apparent counterexamples. This provides a fresh perspective on the debate.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Conceivability — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on conceivability.
  • Modal Epistemology — SEP entry on modal epistemology.
  • Mental Imagery — SEP entry on mental imagery.

68 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality, technical level, and reliability, with slightly lower quantity of information. This indicates a focused, expert-level lecture with strong argumentation.

Reliability 8/10