La problematización en la determinación de la pertinencia y la relevancia. Algunas consideraciones filosóficas

Item: La problematización en la determinación de la pertinencia y la relevancia. Algunas consideraciones filosóficas
Rating: 4
Author: PostSingularity Institute

by Fernando Buen Abad Dominguez

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Philosophy & Ethics QDTTopics in philosophy QDTKPhilosophy: epistemology and theory of knowledge

🎙 Fernando Buen Abad Dominguez 👥 2K 📅 July 9, 2018 ⏱ 73 min 👁 614 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-18

Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

problematizationpertinencerelevancehegemonyemancipation

Summary

In this conference, Fernando Buen Abad Dominguez presents philosophical considerations on the role of problematization in determining the pertinence and relevance of research. He begins by acknowledging his intellectual debt to Adolfo Sánchez Vázquez and Elí de Gortari, whose works on praxis and dialectical logic inform his approach. He then contextualizes the concepts of emancipation and hegemony within the historical framework of the Non-Aligned Movement in 1973, which called for a new international economic order. The speaker highlights the MacBride Report (1980), a UNESCO initiative that diagnosed global communication problems and advocated for a more democratic and pluralistic media landscape. He criticizes the concentration of media ownership, the technological and semantic dependence of Latin American countries, and the triple war (military, media, and financial) waged against peoples. He argues that problematization must be a critical, dynamic, and participatory process that addresses concrete social problems, and that universities have an ethical responsibility to engage with these issues. The talk concludes with a call to rethink territoriality in the face of globalized media power and to prioritize research that serves social emancipation.

180 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in its critical perspective on media concentration and the need for a participatory approach to research. The argumentation is coherent and draws on historical examples, such as the MacBride Report, to support the claims. However, the presentation is largely ideological and lacks empirical evidence or systematic analysis. The speaker’s rhetorical style is persuasive but sometimes relies on sweeping generalizations and emotional appeals.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speaker references several sources, including the works of Sánchez Vázquez and Elí de Gortari, and the MacBride Report. These are credible academic and institutional sources. However, the talk does not provide detailed citations or verifiable data for many claims. The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on philosophical considerations of problematization. The talk is well-structured but could benefit from more rigorous sourcing and evidence.

149 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the philosophical considerations of problematization in research, particularly in relation to pertinence and relevance.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speaker is a philosopher with extensive academic credentials, and the talk is grounded in references to established thinkers (Sánchez Vázquez, Elí de Gortari) and the MacBride Report. However, the presentation is largely ideological and lacks empirical data or systematic verification of claims.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

Filosofía de la praxis — Referenced as a key work by Adolfo Sánchez Vázquez influencing the speaker's approach.
Lógica dialéctica — Referenced as a key work by Elí de Gortari influencing the speaker's approach.
MacBride Report (Many Voices, One World) — Discussed as a landmark UNESCO report on communication problems and democratization.

Concurring Sources

MacBride Report — The report's findings on media concentration align with the speaker's arguments.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk offers a critical perspective on the role of problematization in research, emphasizing the need for participatory and socially relevant approaches. It connects philosophical concepts to concrete issues of media hegemony and emancipation. The speaker’s call for a ’triple war’ framework provides a novel way to understand contemporary power structures.

Pour aller plus loin :

Problematization (philosophy) — Relevant for understanding the concept’s philosophical roots.
MacBride Report — Provides background on the report discussed in the talk.
Hegemony — Key concept in the talk, with links to Gramsci’s theory.

90 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the speaker's extensive knowledge and the richness of the content. The technical level is moderate, indicating a balance between accessibility and depth. The overall reliability is slightly lower due to the ideological nature of the presentation and lack of empirical verification.

Reliability 6/10