Consideraciones para una epistemología descolonizada

Consideraciones para una epistemología descolonizada

🎙 Susana de Luque 👥 2K 📅 June 9, 2018 ⏱ 50 min 👁 485 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-18
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

colonialityepistemic delinkingecology of knowledgestraditional knowledgevivir bien

Summary

In this conference, Susana de Luque presents a decolonial epistemological perspective, arguing that modern science and epistemology are deeply intertwined with colonialism. She introduces the concept of coloniality of power, developed by Aníbal Quijano, which highlights how colonial domination extends beyond economics to shape knowledge, subjectivity, and culture. She discusses the coloniality of knowledge and being, emphasizing the role of science and law in legitimizing certain ways of thinking while marginalizing others. De Luque then explores proposals for epistemic delinking, drawing on the work of Boaventura de Sousa Santos on the ecology of knowledges, which advocates for recognizing multiple forms of knowledge and fostering intercultural dialogue. She also incorporates Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui’s critique, emphasizing the need for concrete practices and the concept of ‘ch’ixi’ (mestizo epistemology). The lecture examines the recognition of traditional knowledge in the plurinational constitutions of Bolivia and Ecuador, highlighting the concept of ‘vivir bien’ (living well) and the challenges posed to intellectual property systems. De Luque concludes by stressing the importance of constructing broader frameworks that include indigenous epistemic alterity.

174 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides a valuable overview of decolonial epistemology, synthesizing key concepts from prominent thinkers. The argumentation is coherent and well-structured, building from the coloniality of power to specific proposals for decolonization. However, it remains largely theoretical and does not critically engage with potential limitations or counterarguments. The presentation is persuasive but could benefit from concrete examples or case studies beyond the constitutional reforms.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The lecture demonstrates scientific rigor by grounding its arguments in established academic literature, citing Aníbal Quijano, Boaventura de Sousa Santos, and Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. The author’s own published work adds credibility. The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on epistemological considerations from a decolonial perspective. The sources are used appropriately, though the lecture does not critically assess them.

138 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on epistemological considerations from a decolonial perspective.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The lecture is based on the author's master's thesis, published as a book, and draws on established scholars in decolonial thought (Quijano, de Sousa Santos, Rivera Cusicanqui). It presents a coherent theoretical framework but lacks empirical data and critical engagement with counterarguments.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America — Aníbal Quijano's foundational essay on coloniality of power.
  • Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide — Boaventura de Sousa Santos' book on epistemologies of the South.

Dissenting Sources

  • Critique of decolonial theory — Some scholars argue that decolonial theory can be essentialist and overlook internal power dynamics within indigenous communities.

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture provides a comprehensive synthesis of decolonial epistemology, integrating the works of Quijano, de Sousa Santos, and Rivera Cusicanqui, and applying them to the constitutional experiences of Bolivia and Ecuador. It highlights the concept of ‘vivir bien’ as an alternative ethical framework. The originality lies in its accessible presentation of complex ideas and its focus on the practical implications for legal and political frameworks.

Pour aller plus loin :

106 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information and reliability, reflecting the lecture's solid theoretical foundation. The quantity of information is moderate, and the technical level is accessible, making it suitable for a general academic audience. The overall balance suggests a well-structured and informative presentation.

Reliability 7/10

💬 Sur les 0 commentaires analysés, aucune tendance n'est disponible.