V Congreso Internacional de Epistemología y Metodología / Conferencia Lic. Oriana Cosso

V Congreso Internacional de Epistemología y Metodología / Conferencia Lic. Oriana Cosso

🎙 Oriana Cosso 👥 2K 📅 July 7, 2018 ⏱ 17 min 👁 224 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-18
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

temporalitypost-developmentemancipationhegemonydecolonial

Summary

In this conference talk, Oriana Cosso presents her doctoral research on the concept of development and its effects on Latin American identity. She argues that development, originally a biological concept, when applied to societies, produces despotic political effects. Drawing on Aristotle’s categories of being and non-being, she explores the notion of ’not-yet-being’ as a way to understand Latin America’s position in the global order. She critiques the Enlightenment’s linear temporality and the developmentalist mentality that defines Latin American countries as lacking. Cosso connects this to the decolonial school of thought and the work of thinkers like Dussel and Heidegger. She emphasizes the need for emancipation and a rethinking of values beyond technocratic and economic reductionism. The talk also touches on biopiracy, environmental issues, and the role of philosophy in addressing these challenges. She concludes by invoking the convergent ethics of Ricardo Maliandi, which grounds ethics in conflictivity rather than harmony.

150 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk offers a valuable philosophical critique of development discourse, providing a nuanced analysis of how language and concepts shape reality. The argumentation is solid, drawing on classical and contemporary philosophers to support the thesis. The speaker effectively uses the concept of ’not-yet-being’ to challenge the deficit-based view of Latin America. However, the argument is dense and may require prior knowledge of philosophy to fully appreciate.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The lecture demonstrates scientific rigor through its engagement with canonical philosophical texts and contemporary decolonial theory. The speaker cites Aristotle, Heidegger, Dussel, and others, grounding her claims in established scholarship. The title accurately reflects the content, as the talk is indeed about epistemology and methodology, specifically the temporality of Latin American being. The presentation is well-structured and coherent.

139 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a conference presentation on epistemology and methodology, focusing on the temporality of Latin American being and post-development.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The lecture is a well-structured philosophical argument grounded in the Western philosophical tradition (Aristotle, Heidegger, etc.) and contemporary decolonial thought. The speaker demonstrates expertise and provides a coherent critical framework, though it is an opinion piece rather than an empirical study.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Aristotle's Metaphysics — Referenced for the categories of being and non-being.
  • Heidegger's hermeneutic philosophy — Mentioned as a methodological approach.
  • Dussel's decolonial philosophy — Cited as part of the decolonial school.
  • Maliandi's convergent ethics — Discussed as a framework for ethics in conflict.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The talk contributes a novel philosophical perspective on development by linking it to the ontological category of ’not-yet-being’, offering a critical lens on how Latin America is defined by lack. It integrates decolonial thought with classical philosophy, proposing a revaluation of Enlightenment ideals through a temporal and ethical dimension.

Pour aller plus loin :

79 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information and technical level, indicating a well-argued and intellectually demanding presentation. The quantity of information is moderate, reflecting the focused scope of the talk. Overall, the profile suggests a strong philosophical contribution with a solid foundation.

Reliability 7/10