XR in Applications | Zuzana Berger Haladová | Cognitive Science Seminar

XR in Applications | Zuzana Berger Haladová | Cognitive Science Seminar

🎙 Zuzana Berger Haladová 👥 1K 📅 December 1, 2025 ⏱ 53 min 👁 84 📄 lecture 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

XRARVRCultural ComputingRestoration

Summary

Zuzana Berger Haladová, a researcher with a PhD in augmented reality and cultural heritage, presents her collaborations in XR applications. She introduces the concepts of VR, AR, MR, and XR, and discusses the reasons for the recent hype in these technologies: hardware affordability, ease of application development, and user acceptance. She then details two main projects. The first is a VR-based psychological intervention conducted with the Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, involving forest therapy and empty chair therapy. The forest therapy compared the effects of virtual forest vs. city environments on emotional state, self-compassion, and self-criticism, using full-body tracking and eye tracking. The empty chair therapy, based on emotion-focused therapy, used VR to allow participants to see their avatar from a different perspective. The second project focuses on using computer vision and AR to aid in the restoration of cultural heritage, particularly in educating the public about the restoration process. She describes collaborations with restorers from the Academy of Fine Arts and Design, including an AR installation at the Venice Biennale and efforts to visualize restoration phases. The talk concludes with a discussion of the importance of restoration and the potential of XR in this field.

197 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides valuable insights into the practical applications of XR in psychology and cultural heritage, based on the speaker’s direct involvement in these projects. The argumentation is solid, supported by concrete examples and project outcomes. The speaker effectively explains the technical challenges and solutions, such as matching real and virtual chairs in the forest therapy and creating appropriate avatar emotions. However, some claims lack detailed evidence, and the presentation could benefit from more rigorous data presentation.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speaker references several publications and projects, but does not provide explicit citations during the talk. The title accurately reflects the content, which covers various XR applications. The talk is based on the speaker’s expertise and collaborations, lending credibility, but the lack of formal citations reduces the scientific rigor. The speaker mentions a publication in ‘Internet Interventions’ and a conference paper, but these are not detailed. The content is well-structured and informative.

164 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which covers various applications of XR in psychology and cultural heritage.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The lecture is based on the speaker's direct experience in multiple XR projects, with references to published research and collaborations with academic institutions. However, it lacks detailed citations and some claims are anecdotal.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Internet Interventions — Publication of the empty chair therapy study.
  • Conference paper on forest therapy — Currently in print, presenting the forest therapy intervention.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The talk provides a unique perspective on the application of XR in psychology and cultural heritage, highlighting the collaboration between computer scientists and domain experts. It offers practical insights into the development and implementation of VR interventions, including technical challenges and solutions. The emphasis on restoration education through AR is a novel contribution.

Pour aller plus loin :

81 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, with moderate technical level and reliability. This indicates a well-structured and informative lecture, though it could benefit from more technical depth and formal citations.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.