Getting Buy-In: Overcoming Larman's Law • Allen Holub • GOTO 2025

Getting Buy-In: Overcoming Larman's Law • Allen Holub • GOTO 2025

🎙 Allen Holub 👥 1.1M 📅 December 11, 2025 ⏱ 56 min 👁 3K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-02
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Larman's LawConway's Laworganizational changeagilemanagement buy-in

Summary

In this GOTO Copenhagen 2025 talk, Allen Holub addresses the challenge of overcoming organizational resistance to change, as described by Larman’s Law. He explains that organizations are optimized to maintain the status quo, and any change initiative is often derided as ‘purist’ or ’theoretical.’ Holub argues that traditional management thinking, rooted in assembly-line manufacturing, is ill-suited for software development, which is a craft requiring feedback and adaptation. He emphasizes that transformation is not about moving from a ‘desert’ to a ‘forest’ but about incrementally introducing change, one oasis at a time. He discusses Conway’s Law, which states that communication paths in an organization mirror the systems it produces, and suggests that organizational change must be accompanied by software architecture changes. Holub provides practical advice on how to communicate with managers, focusing on business value rather than technical details. He introduces concepts like Value Stream Mapping and the time value of money to build a business case for innovation. He concludes that while change is difficult and not always possible, it can be achieved through small, targeted improvements and by speaking the language of business.

184 words

Critical Evaluation

Allen Holub’s talk offers a pragmatic and insightful perspective on organizational change in software development. The value of the information lies in its practical advice for developers and managers seeking to implement innovative practices like mob programming or no-estimation. Holub draws on his extensive experience and references established concepts such as Larman’s Law and Conway’s Law, which are widely recognized in the software engineering community. The argumentation is coherent and well-structured, moving from the problem (Larman’s Law) to potential solutions (incremental change, business case). However, the talk is primarily based on anecdotal evidence and personal opinion rather than empirical research. While Holub mentions that rational thinking does not work, he does not provide scientific studies to support his claims. The quality of sources is moderate; he references Craig Larman’s work and provides links to his own resources, but there is a lack of peer-reviewed literature. The adéquation between title and content is strong, as the talk directly addresses overcoming resistance to change. The talk is aimed at a professional audience, but the analysis does not consider the level of the public. Overall, the talk is valuable for its practical insights and experienced perspective, but its reliability is limited by the absence of rigorous scientific evidence. The speaker’s credibility is high, but the content would benefit from more empirical support. The talk also touches on the importance of aligning software architecture with organizational structure, which is a valuable point. The discussion of Value Stream Mapping and time value of money provides concrete tools for building a business case. However, the talk could be criticized for being overly pessimistic about the possibility of large-scale transformation, which might discourage some listeners. Despite this, the incremental approach advocated is realistic and actionable. In conclusion, the talk is a solid contribution to the discourse on agile and organizational change, offering practical wisdom from a seasoned practitioner.

311 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on overcoming organizational resistance to change, specifically Larman's Law.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The talk is based on the speaker's extensive experience and references well-known concepts (Larman's Law, Conway's Law) but lacks empirical data or peer-reviewed sources. The argumentation is coherent and practical, but the reliability is limited by anecdotal evidence and personal opinion.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The talk provides a practical framework for overcoming organizational resistance to change, emphasizing incremental change and business case development. It offers actionable advice on communicating with management using concepts like Value Stream Mapping and time value of money.

Pour aller plus loin :

89 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and reliability, with moderate technical depth. This indicates a talk that is rich in content and credible, but not overly technical, making it accessible to a broad professional audience.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.