Les 10 MEILLEURS JEUX 2026... selon les JOUEURS 😯

Les 10 MEILLEURS JEUX 2026... selon les JOUEURS 😯

🎙 Julien Chièze 👥 941K 📅 July 19, 2026 ⏱ 23 min 👁 36K 📄 news review 🧭 2026-08-03
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Metacriticuser scorestop 102026video games

Summary

In this video, Julien Chièze presents a top 10 of the best video games of 2026 according to player scores on Metacritic, as of mid-July 2026. He explains his methodology: he uses the user scores, and in case of ties, the press average to break them. The list starts with 007 First Light in 10th place (8.4/10), followed by Forza Horizon 6 (8.4/10, but higher press score), Gothic 1 Remake (8.5/10), LEGO Batman Legacy of the Dark Knight (8.5/10), Rhythm Paradise Groove (8.6/10), Pokémon Pokopia (8.6/10), Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced (8.7/10), and then the top 3. He highlights the sometimes significant gaps between player and press scores, such as for Gothic 1 Remake (73% press vs 8.5 player). He also notes the commercial success of Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced (3 million sales in a week). The video ends with the top 3, but the transcript is cut off before revealing the top 3. The creator also discusses the importance of player feedback and the success of Capcom in 2026.

171 words

Critical Evaluation

The video provides a clear and structured overview of the top 10 games of 2026 based on Metacritic user scores. The methodology is transparent: the creator uses user scores and breaks ties with press averages, which is a reasonable approach. The selection of games is diverse, covering various genres and platforms, and the creator adds his own commentary and context for each game, which enhances the value. However, the ranking is inherently subjective and dependent on the fluctuating nature of user scores, which the creator acknowledges. The video does not delve into the reasons behind the scores, such as review bombing or other biases, which could be a limitation. The creator’s personal opinions are clearly separated from the data, but they may influence the presentation. The sources are not explicitly cited in the video, but the reliance on Metacritic is mentioned. The video is well-produced and engaging, with a clear structure. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video delivers on its promise. The main weakness is the lack of in-depth analysis of the scores and the potential for bias in the selection of games. Overall, the video is informative and entertaining, but it could be more rigorous in its analysis.

202 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a top 10 list of the best games of 2026 according to player scores.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is based on user scores from Metacritic, a recognized aggregator, and the methodology is clearly explained. However, the selection and ranking are subjective and may change over time. The creator's personal opinions are clearly separated from the data, and the video is transparent about the limitations.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Metacritic — The video directly uses Metacritic user scores, so it is the primary concordant source.

Dissenting Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a snapshot of player preferences in mid-2026, based on Metacritic user scores. It highlights the gap between player and press scores for certain games, such as Gothic 1 Remake, and the commercial success of Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced. The creator’s commentary adds context and personal insights.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Metacritic — The primary source for user scores.
  • IO Interactive — Developer of 007 First Light, known for the Hitman series.
  • Playground Games — Developer of Forza Horizon 6.
  • Capcom — Publisher of Resident Evil Requiem, mentioned as a top performer.
  • Nintendo — Publisher of Rhythm Paradise Groove and Pokémon Pokopia.

106 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced video with high scores in information quantity and quality, moderate technical depth, and good reliability. The video is informative and well-structured, but it lacks deep technical analysis, making it accessible to a broad audience.

Reliability 7/10

💬 Positive and engaged. Viewers appreciate the video and share their own top games and expectations for the rest of the year. Many also comment on the creator's choice not to assign scores, which they see as a distinctive feature.