Tomorrow is Yesterday: Life, Death and the Pursuit of Peace in Israel/Palestine.

Tomorrow is Yesterday: Life, Death and the Pursuit of Peace in Israel/Palestine.

🎙 Robert Malley, Ezzedine Fishere 👥 4K 📅 February 24, 2026 ⏱ 85 min 👁 255 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

two-state solutionOslo AccordsoccupationGazaUS mediation

Summary

In this conversation, Robert Malley discusses his book ‘Tomorrow is Yesterday’ with Ezzedine Fishere. Malley argues that the October 7 attacks and the subsequent war were not anomalies but reflections of deep-seated dynamics in Israeli and Palestinian societies. He critiques US policy, asserting that American involvement has not only failed but made the situation worse, citing the lack of progress since the Oslo Accords. Malley emphasizes that the US never treated peacemaking as a national security priority, unlike the Iran nuclear deal. He also explores the idea that both sides are trapped in historical narratives, preventing progress. Fishere challenges Malley on the attribution of responsibility, suggesting that the parties themselves bear primary agency. Malley responds that while the parties are primarily responsible, the US’s role as a self-appointed mediator has been counterproductive. The conversation touches on the need to understand the emotional and identity-driven aspects of the conflict, and the difficulty of achieving a two-state solution given these entrenched positions.

160 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high due to Malley’s insider perspective and his willingness to critique US policy. The argumentation is solid, as he supports his claims with historical examples and personal experience. However, some assertions are subjective and open to debate, such as the degree of US culpability. The discussion is thought-provoking and provides a nuanced view of the conflict, though it may not fully address counterarguments.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate; the conversation is based on expert opinion rather than empirical research. The sources cited are primarily the book itself and Malley’s personal experiences. The title accurately reflects the content, and the discussion stays on topic. No specific external sources are mentioned, but the speaker’s credentials lend credibility.

136 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the central thesis that the conflict is stuck in a cycle of repeating past patterns, and the conversation directly addresses this theme.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The discussion features a former senior US diplomat with deep involvement in Middle East peace efforts, providing insider perspectives and critical analysis. The arguments are nuanced and acknowledge complexity, though they are inherently subjective and based on personal experience.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Tomorrow is Yesterday: Life, Death, and the Pursuit of Peace in Israel/Palestine — The book discussed in the conversation, co-authored by Robert Malley and Hussein Agha.

Concurring Sources

  • The Israel-Palestine conflict: a history — BBC overview of the conflict, providing historical context that aligns with the book's narrative.

Dissenting Sources

  • The Case for Israeli-Palestinian Peace — Some critics argue that the peace process has been beneficial and that the US has played a constructive role, contrary to the book's thesis.

Contribution & Novelties

The book offers a critical insider perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, arguing that the peace process has been fundamentally flawed and that the US has been a negative force. It emphasizes the need to understand the historical and emotional dimensions that perpetuate the conflict.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Two-state solution — Provides background on the proposed solution and its challenges.
  • Oslo Accords — Key agreements that shaped the peace process.
  • International Crisis Group — Organization led by Malley, offering analysis on conflicts.

83 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quality and reliability, reflecting the speaker's expertise. The technical level is moderate, indicating accessibility to a general audience. The overall balance suggests a well-rounded discussion with strong credibility.

Reliability 8/10