Solarplaza Webinar | Surviving negative prices: from standalone solar to flexibility strategy

Solarplaza Webinar | Surviving negative prices: from standalone solar to flexibility strategy

🎙 Erik van Boekel 👥 3K 📅 March 11, 2026 ⏱ 52 min 👁 67 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

negative pricessolarflexibilitycurtailmentBRP

Summary

This webinar, hosted by Solarplaza, features Erik van Boekel, CEO of Balanz, discussing the challenges and strategies for standalone solar assets in the Dutch market, particularly focusing on negative power prices and grid congestion. Van Boekel explains that negative prices are becoming a structural feature due to increasing solar penetration, and traditional revenue models are insufficient. He emphasizes the need for flexibility strategies, including hybridisation, smarter dispatch, and portfolio aggregation. The role of Balance Responsible Parties (BRPs) is highlighted, with a focus on advanced weather forecasting, data analytics, and intraday trading to optimize revenues. The presentation covers the impact of negative prices on capture rates, subsidy losses, and imbalance costs, and argues that curtailment and responsive assets are essential. Van Boekel notes that only 20% of assets currently respond to prices, and increasing this to 1.5 GW more could eliminate prolonged negative price blocks. He also discusses value stacking through intraday markets and the importance of risk management. The webinar concludes with a Q&A session.

165 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides valuable insights into the practical challenges of integrating high shares of solar energy, particularly the issue of negative prices and the need for flexibility. The argumentation is solid, grounded in market data and the speaker’s extensive experience. Van Boekel effectively explains the mechanics of negative prices, capture rate decline, and the impact of subsidies, making a compelling case for proactive curtailment and market participation. The discussion on BRPs and the potential for data-driven trading adds depth, though some claims could benefit from more concrete data or references.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate; the presentation is based on the speaker’s professional expertise and general market trends, but specific data points are not fully cited. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on strategies for solar assets to survive negative prices. The webinar is promotional in nature, as it showcases Balanz’s services, but the technical content is informative. No external sources are cited beyond the company’s website and LinkedIn, which limits the verifiability of the claims.

182 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on strategies for solar assets to survive negative prices.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speaker is an experienced energy market professional, and the content is based on market data and practical experience. However, the webinar is promotional in nature, and specific data points are not fully sourced.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Solarplaza Events — The webinar is part of Solarplaza's events, which align with the topic.

Contribution & Novelties

The webinar offers a practical perspective on how standalone solar can adapt to negative prices, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and market participation. It highlights the role of BRPs and data-driven strategies, which is a relatively novel approach for asset owners. The discussion on the potential of marginal increases in steerable capacity to eliminate prolonged negative price blocks is insightful.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Negative electricity prices — Provides background on the phenomenon.
  • Balance responsible party — Explains the role of BRPs in energy markets.
  • Curtailment (electricity) — Discusses curtailment as a flexibility measure.

95 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, with moderate technical depth and reliability. This indicates a well-informed presentation that is accessible to a broad audience, but with some limitations in sourcing and depth.

Reliability 7/10