INQA Conference 2025: Yusuke Hama - GQuAT, AIST

INQA Conference 2025: Yusuke Hama - GQuAT, AIST

🎙 Yusuke Hama 👥 311 📅 November 28, 2025 ⏱ 25 min 👁 23 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

subsamplingfactorization machineannealingexploration-exploitationlossy compression

Summary

Yusuke Hama, a research scientist at AIST, presents his work on Subsampling Factorization Machine Annealing (SFMA) at the INQA Conference 2025. The talk begins with an introduction to black-box optimization and its importance in real-world problems. He explains the Factorization Machine Annealing (FMA) algorithm, which combines factorization machines with annealing methods (simulated and quantum). The main contribution is SFMA, which uses subsampled datasets to train the factorization machine, introducing probabilistic fluctuations that enhance exploration. This leads to improved performance in terms of speed and accuracy compared to FMA. Numerical experiments on lossy compression of data matrices (matrix factorization) demonstrate that SFMA outperforms FMA, and by adjusting the subsampling ratio R, scalability is observed. The speaker also discusses results with quantum annealing, noting no clear quantum advantage in this problem, but suggesting future work. The talk concludes with a summary and future directions, followed by a Q&A session where questions about hyperparameter tuning and overfitting are addressed.

156 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides a clear and well-structured presentation of a novel algorithm. The value lies in the introduction of subsampling to enhance exploration in factorization machine annealing, addressing a known limitation of FMA. The argumentation is solid: the speaker motivates the need for exploration-exploitation balance, explains the mechanism of SFMA, and supports claims with numerical experiments. The results show consistent improvement over FMA across multiple problem instances. The discussion of scalability and the potential for lower computational cost adds practical value. However, the talk does not provide a theoretical analysis of why subsampling works, and the choice of hyperparameters (e.g., R) is not systematically optimized, which is acknowledged in the Q&A.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk is scientifically rigorous: the methodology is clearly described, and the experiments are benchmarked against a baseline. The speaker cites prior work on FMA (e.g., by Kikuchi) but does not provide specific references or URLs. The title accurately reflects the content. The presentation is from a conference, so it is not peer-reviewed, but the speaker’s affiliation with AIST lends credibility. The Q&A session shows engagement with the audience and addresses potential concerns, such as overfitting, which the speaker clarifies is not a risk in this context. Overall, the sources are not explicitly cited, but the work appears to be based on established literature in the field.

233 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a presentation by Yusuke Hama at the INQA Conference 2025, affiliated with GQuAT, AIST.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk presents original research with clear methodology, numerical experiments, and benchmarking. The speaker is a research scientist at AIST, a reputable institution. The results are presented with appropriate caveats, and the discussion includes critical questions from the audience. However, the video is a conference presentation, not a peer-reviewed publication, and the sample sizes are small.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The main novelty is the introduction of subsampling in factorization machine annealing to enhance exploration, addressing a known weakness of FMA. This is a practical improvement that shows better performance in numerical experiments. The approach is simple yet effective, and the scalability potential is promising.

Pour aller plus loin :

89 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores across all dimensions, indicating a well-rounded presentation with strong technical content, clear communication, and reliable methodology. The lowest score is in 'quantite_information' (8), but still high, reflecting the focused scope of the talk.

Reliability 8/10