(TR06)(T&S) From takedown to staydown, the never-ending journey to a decent protection of victims...

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high due to the diverse expert perspectives, including law enforcement, NGOs, regulatory bodies, and technical providers. The argumentation is solid, grounded in practical experience and recent cases, such as the use of GDPR in litigation. The discussion effectively highlights the gaps in current legal frameworks and the challenges posed by AI-generated content. However, some arguments are based on anecdotal evidence and personal opinions rather than systematic data, which slightly weakens the overall rigor.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The discussion demonstrates scientific rigor through references to specific tools like hash databases, the DSA, and GDPR, and mentions a report by HateAid. However, no formal citations are provided, and the sources are not systematically referenced. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on the journey from takedown to staydown. The panelists’ expertise adds credibility, but the lack of verifiable sources limits the overall rigor.

The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on the challenges of moving from takedown to staydown in protecting victims of image-based sexual abuse.

7/10

The discussion features expert panelists from law enforcement, NGOs, regulatory bodies, and technical providers, providing a multi-stakeholder perspective. However, it is a debate format with limited verifiable data and no formal citations, relying on anecdotal evidence and personal experience.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 02:00Introduction by moderator on the increase of image-based sexual abuse and the need for a coordinated response.
• 05:00Aurelie discusses lessons from CSAM, emphasizing the need to go from takedown to staydown.
• 10:00Discussion on the role of the DSA and international cooperation in combating CSAM.
• 15:00Laura Blue highlights the evolving forms of IBSA, including AI-generated content and the burden of proof on victims.
• 20:00Josephine Ballon shares data from HateAid's report, noting that 40% of their reportings are related to IBSA.
• 25:00Arda Gerkens discusses the regulatory perspective and the need to change mentality, citing the Taylor Swift deepfake example.
• 30:00Gerald explains the technical solutions like hashing and the importance of open-source tooling.
• 35:00Josephine describes a GDPR-based strategic litigation case against Google for image search results.
• 40:00Panel discusses the burden of proof and the need for platforms to take responsibility.
• 45:00Conclusion emphasizing the need for legal action and support for victims.

• INCYBER Forum Europe — Official website of the INCYBER Forum, the event where this panel discussion took place.
• INCYBER Forum LinkedIn — LinkedIn page of the INCYBER Forum, providing additional context about the event.

• HateAid Report on Online Violence — Mentioned by Josephine Ballon as a recent report showing that 40% of their reportings are related to IBSA.