Mesa de intercambio sobre políticas públicas y violencia hacia Niños, Niñas y Adolescentes

Mesa de intercambio sobre políticas públicas y violencia hacia Niños, Niñas y Adolescentes

by Facultad de Psicología Universidad de la República

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Society & Culture JBFKViolence and abuse in societyJBFK1Child abuse
🎙 Facultad de Psicología Universidad de la República 👥 17K 📅 June 8, 2026 ⏱ 129 min 👁 145 📄 debate 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

violencechild protectionpublic policiespsychologyUruguay

Summary

The video is a panel discussion organized by the Faculty of Psychology of the University of the Republic (Uruguay) on public policies and violence against children and adolescents. The panel includes four speakers: Karina Maestro from the Instituto Mujer y Sociedad, Diego Jiménez from the civil organization Providencia, Luisana Alón from the Unit of Victims and Witnesses, and Diego Pesano and Natalia Gómez from the CPIA (System of Protection to Childhood and Adolescence against Violence). Each speaker shares their professional experience and reflections on the topic. Karina discusses the role of specialized services and territorial proximity, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary approaches and the need to believe children’s accounts. Diego Jiménez emphasizes the complexity of situations and the need for a contextualized understanding, avoiding simplistic judgments. Luisana Alón focuses on ensuring access to justice for children and adolescents, addressing the challenges of legal processes. The CPIA representatives discuss the challenges of public policies in addressing violence. The discussion underscores the importance of inter-institutional coordination, the need for specialized and reparative approaches, and the centrality of the child’s best interest. The panel also touches on the evolution of legislation in Uruguay, such as the Code of Childhood and Adolescence (2004) and the Integral Law on Gender-Based Violence (2017). The speakers highlight the need for a comprehensive and rights-based perspective, integrating psychological, legal, and social dimensions. The video is a valuable resource for students and professionals in psychology and related fields, offering practical insights and theoretical frameworks for addressing violence against minors.

250 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights from practitioners directly involved in addressing violence against children and adolescents. The arguments are grounded in real-world experience and reference to Uruguayan legal frameworks, which strengthens their credibility. The speakers emphasize the importance of a complex, interdisciplinary, and rights-based approach, and they critically discuss the challenges and obstacles in the field, such as lack of resources and differing interpretations of the child’s best interest. The argumentation is coherent and well-structured, with each speaker contributing distinct perspectives that complement each other.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate: the content is based on professional experience and references to national laws and institutional practices, but it does not cite specific research studies. The sources mentioned are mainly legal documents and institutional frameworks, which are appropriate for the topic. The title accurately reflects the content, and the discussion is well-aligned with the stated theme. The video is produced by a university faculty, adding to its credibility. No comments were provided for analysis.

177 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a panel discussion on public policies and violence against children and adolescents.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video is a panel discussion with experts in psychology and public policy, providing practical and theoretical insights. The content is grounded in professional experience and references to Uruguayan legislation and institutional frameworks. The reliability is high due to the expertise of the speakers and the institutional context, though it is not a peer-reviewed scientific source.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

  • Ley de Violencia Doméstica (2002) — Referenced as a legal framework for domestic violence.
  • Código de la Niñez y la Adolescencia (Ley 17.823, 2004) — Mentioned as a key legal instrument for child protection.
  • Ley Integral de Violencia hacia las Mujeres Basada en Género (Ley 19.580, 2017) — Referenced as a recent law addressing gender-based violence.

Concurring Sources

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child — International legal framework supporting children's rights and protection.
  • UNICEF Child Protection — Global perspective on child protection systems and policies.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a unique perspective by bringing together practitioners from different institutional contexts to discuss the intersection of public policies and violence against children. It highlights the practical challenges and ethical considerations in the field, providing a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved. The emphasis on territorial approaches and inter-institutional coordination is particularly valuable.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child — International legal framework for children’s rights.
  • Child Protection Systems — UNICEF’s approach to strengthening child protection systems.
  • Trauma-Informed Care — Principles for trauma-informed approaches in services.

94 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the rich content and expert contributions. The technical level is moderate, indicating that the content is accessible to a broad audience while still offering depth. The overall reliability is high due to the institutional backing and professional expertise.

Reliability 8/10