VI Encuentro de Psicología y Educación: "Los vínculos con las tecnologías en la era de la IA.."

VI Encuentro de Psicología y Educación: "Los vínculos con las tecnologías en la era de la IA.."

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Education JNEducationJNCEducational psychology
🎙 Roxana Cabello 👥 17K 📅 August 10, 2026 ⏱ 82 min 👁 40 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

technology bondschildhoodagencydigital literacyschool

Summary

In this conference, Roxana Cabello, a sociologist and researcher on technology appropriation, discusses how children’s relationships with technology are socially constructed rather than natural. She presents a framework of multiple factors influencing these bonds, including access, usage dynamics, regulations, personal dispositions, and literacy models. She traces historical shifts from print to audiovisual media, noting how schools have often distanced themselves from new media, and how discourses of ‘addiction’ have emerged. She introduces the concept of ‘agency’ as a key to fostering critical distance and autonomy in children’s technology use. The talk emphasizes the role of schools in shaping these bonds and calls for updated literacy models that include multiple languages. She concludes by opening the floor for discussion, having laid out a complex, historically informed perspective on the topic.

129 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights by challenging the naturalization of children’s technology use, offering a multi-factor model that includes access, usage dynamics, regulations, and personal dispositions. The argumentation is solid, grounded in decades of empirical research and theoretical frameworks like Giddens’ concept of agency. The historical perspective, contrasting print and audiovisual media, effectively illustrates how technology bonds evolve. The speaker’s expertise lends credibility, though the argumentation is more descriptive than prescriptive, and some concepts (like ‘agency’) are presented with limited critical depth.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speaker cites her own publications and mentions key references like ‘Television Addiction’ by Robin Smith, but does not provide systematic citations or URLs. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on technology bonds, childhood, and agency in the AI era. The talk is rigorous in its use of empirical evidence and theoretical grounding, though it lacks formal source citations. The audience’s comments are not provided, so no analysis of public reception is possible.

171 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the talk focuses on the construction of bonds with technology in childhood and the role of agency, within the context of AI.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The speaker is a sociologist and doctor in social communication with extensive research experience on technology appropriation. The talk is based on her own empirical studies and references established theories (e.g., Giddens). However, it is an opinion/expert lecture without formal peer review or systematic citation of sources.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Television Addiction (Robin Smith) — Referenced as the first book to popularize the concept of television addiction in the 1980s.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The talk offers a comprehensive framework for understanding technology bonds in childhood, emphasizing the social construction and historical variability of these bonds. It integrates multiple factors and introduces the concept of agency as a lens for educational intervention. The speaker’s empirical research adds depth, though the talk is more of a synthesis than a novel contribution.

Pour aller plus loin :

96 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quality and reliability, reflecting the speaker's expertise and empirical grounding. The technical level is moderate, making the content accessible to a broad academic audience. The quantity of information is substantial, though the talk is more conceptual than data-heavy.

Reliability 8/10