Encuentro de investigadores del proyecto CAPES-AUGM

Encuentro de investigadores del proyecto CAPES-AUGM

🎙 Facultad de Psicología Universidad de la República 👥 17K 📅 August 10, 2026 ⏱ 201 min 👁 26 📄 documentary 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

CAPES-AUGMauthorityresistancenew rightfeminist movements

Summary

This video is a recording of the opening session and first panel of the annual meeting of the CAPES-AUGM project, titled ‘Discourses, effects of authority and resistance: new right and feminist movements in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina’. The event took place on August 4-5, 2026, at the Faculty of Psychology of the Universidad de la República. The opening session includes presentations by the project coordinator Mónica Zoppi-Fontana, who discusses the project’s history, objectives, and the importance of international cooperation and public universities. Marcelo Gambini presents a theoretical framework based on discourse analysis, emphasizing that authority is a discursive effect and not a natural attribute. The first panel, ‘Feminisms and feminist resistances’, features a presentation by Luciana Viñas, who begins her talk on the discourse of Marielle Franco, a Brazilian politician assassinated in 2018, and its implications for understanding political authority and resistance. The video captures the academic discussions, highlighting the project’s focus on analyzing contemporary discourses of authority and resistance in the context of neoliberal capitalism and the rise of new right movements in the region.

176 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the theoretical and methodological approaches of the CAPES-AUGM project. The argumentation is solid, grounded in discourse analysis and psychoanalytic theory, with references to thinkers like Pêcheux and Foucault. The speakers articulate a clear framework for understanding authority as a discursive effect and resistance as a process of reconfiguration of meanings. The presentations are coherent and well-structured, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the political dynamics in Latin America.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is adequate for an academic event, with presentations based on ongoing research and theoretical frameworks. However, specific sources are not cited in detail within the video, and the content is not peer-reviewed. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a meeting of researchers from the CAPES-AUGM project. The video is a recording of a live event, so the quality is typical of such recordings.

157 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a meeting of researchers from the CAPES-AUGM project.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a recording of an academic event with presentations by researchers from recognized universities. The content is grounded in discourse analysis and psychoanalytic theory, with references to theoretical frameworks. However, it is not peer-reviewed and lacks detailed source citations within the video itself.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • CAPES-AUGM Project — The video itself is the primary source, documenting the project's meeting.

Concurring Sources

  • CAPES-AUGM Project — The video itself is the primary source, documenting the project's meeting.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers an original contribution by bringing together researchers from different countries to discuss the discursive construction of authority and resistance in the context of new right movements and feminist activism. It highlights the importance of international academic cooperation and the role of public universities in producing knowledge that can intervene in society.

Pour aller plus loin :

102 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows balanced scores across all dimensions, indicating a well-rounded academic presentation with strong theoretical grounding and adequate information quality. The high technical level reflects the specialized audience, while the reliability is supported by the institutional context.

Reliability 7/10