Conferencia: "Masculinidades: construcción, deconstrucción y reconstrucción conservadora"

Conferencia: "Masculinidades: construcción, deconstrucción y reconstrucción conservadora"

🎙 Débora Tajer 👥 17K 📅 December 8, 2025 ⏱ 56 min 👁 367 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

masculinityintersectionalitypsychoanalysisgenderhegemony

Summary

In this conference, Débora Tajer, a psychologist and psychoanalyst from the University of Buenos Aires, presents a comprehensive analysis of contemporary masculinities from an intersectional and psychoanalytic perspective. She proposes a ‘hybrid’ conception of masculinity, recognizing that men occupy both hegemonic and subordinated positions depending on intersecting axes such as class, race, and sexual orientation. She distinguishes between macro and micro levels of intersectionality, emphasizing the subjective and singular experience of power and inequality. Tajer identifies real changes in masculinities, particularly in fatherhood and the loosening of heteronormativity, but notes persistent issues in male-female relationships, where a ‘heterosexuality of domination’ remains. She introduces concepts like ‘heteropessimism’ and the ‘field of the similar’ to explain ethical lapses in intimate relationships. The lecture also addresses the clinical challenges of working with hegemonic masculinity, which is often ego-syntonic and resistant to change. Finally, she discusses the current conservative backlash, which she sees as a reaction to the democratization of discomforts and the crisis of traditional male privilege.

164 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture offers valuable insights by integrating intersectionality with psychoanalytic theory, providing a nuanced framework for understanding masculinities. Tajer’s argumentation is solid, grounded in clinical experience and theoretical concepts, though it relies more on expert opinion than empirical data. She effectively challenges simplistic views of masculinity, highlighting the complexity of power dynamics and the need for a hybrid approach. The discussion of ‘heteropessimism’ and the ‘field of the similar’ adds original perspectives. However, some claims could benefit from more supporting evidence.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The presentation demonstrates scientific rigor through its coherent theoretical framework and references to established authors (e.g., Derrida, Agamben, Bleichmar). However, specific sources are not systematically cited, and the lecture is based on the speaker’s expertise and clinical observations. The title accurately reflects the content, which systematically addresses the construction, deconstruction, and conservative reconstruction of masculinities. The speaker’s credentials and institutional affiliation enhance credibility.

159 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which systematically addresses the construction, deconstruction, and conservative reconstruction of masculinities.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The speaker is a recognized expert in psychology and gender studies, with extensive academic and clinical experience. The content is well-structured, theoretically grounded, and draws on established concepts (intersectionality, psychoanalysis). However, it is primarily an opinion-based lecture with limited empirical data or citations.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Heridos Corazones — Mentioned as a book by the speaker, published in 2009.
  • Psicoanálisis para TODEX — Mentioned as a book by the speaker, published in 2020.
  • TED Talk (2019) — Mentioned as a talk given by the speaker.

Concurring Sources

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. — Foundational work on hegemonic masculinity, aligns with Tajer's framework.

Dissenting Sources

  • Critiques of intersectionality (e.g., by some scholars) — Some argue that intersectionality can be overly complex or difficult to operationalize, which may challenge Tajer's application.

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture contributes an original framework for understanding masculinities by integrating intersectionality with psychoanalytic theory, emphasizing the hybrid nature of identity and the importance of micro-level analysis. It introduces concepts like ‘heteropessimism’ and the ‘field of the similar’ to explain ethical dynamics in intimate relationships. The call for a clinical approach that starts from men’s own perceived inequalities is innovative.

Pour aller plus loin :

94 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, with a strong technical level, indicating a dense and well-argued lecture. The overall reliability is high, though the reliance on expert opinion rather than empirical data slightly lowers the score.

Reliability 8/10

💬 Sur les 0 commentaires analysés, aucune tendance n'est disponible.