VI Encuentro de Psicología y Educación: "Lenguajes, tecnologías y accesibilidad..."

VI Encuentro de Psicología y Educación: "Lenguajes, tecnologías y accesibilidad..."

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Education JNEducationJNCEducational psychology
🎙 Facultad de Psicología Universidad de la República 👥 17K 📅 August 27, 2026 ⏱ 85 min 👁 3 📄 documentary 🧭 2026-08-27
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

accessibilityinclusive educationdigital inclusionearly childhooddeaf culture

Summary

This video is a recording of a panel discussion from the VI International Meeting on Psychology and Education, titled ‘Languages, Technologies and Accessibility: Contemporary Challenges for Educational Inclusion and Participation’. The panel, moderated by Leonardo Peluso, brings together four groups working on accessibility and inclusion in Uruguay. Tatiana Stanisich from the Technological University of Uruguay (UTEC) presents her work on digital inclusion, focusing on supporting students with disabilities, training teachers, and making institutional platforms accessible. Andrea Barcia, representing the Interinstitutional Working Group on Inclusive Early Childhood Education, discusses a self-administered course for educators, which has reached participants across all 19 departments. The ‘Palabras Ocultas’ project team, including Luciana Mainero and others, presents their podcast that gives voice to people with disabilities, emphasizing accessible communication and co-creation. Leonardo Peluso shares insights from his work with the deaf community, challenging the centrality of alphabetic writing and proposing videograbaciones as legitimate textual forms. The panel highlights the need to institutionalize accessibility, transform educational practices, and ensure active participation of people with disabilities. The discussion underscores the importance of interinstitutional collaboration and the ongoing struggle against normative ideologies and oppression structures.

187 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into practical initiatives for educational inclusion and accessibility in Uruguay. Each presentation offers concrete examples of how institutions are addressing barriers, such as UTEC’s dual approach of supporting students and training teachers, and the early childhood course that reaches remote areas. The argumentation is solid, grounded in real experiences and institutional frameworks. The panel effectively demonstrates the importance of interinstitutional collaboration and the need for systemic changes. However, the discussion is more descriptive than analytical, with limited critical evaluation of the effectiveness of these initiatives. The presentations are largely positive, with little discussion of challenges or failures, which could provide a more balanced view.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video demonstrates a high level of rigor in its presentation, with speakers referencing institutional policies and documents, such as UTEC’s inclusion policy and the early childhood course materials. However, specific sources are not cited in detail, and the discussion relies on anecdotal evidence and institutional reports. The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on languages, technologies, and accessibility. The panel is well-structured, with each group presenting their work and then opening for discussion. The presence of sign language interpretation adds to the accessibility of the event. Overall, the video is reliable as a record of institutional practices, but it lacks formal academic citations and critical analysis.

232 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on languages, technologies, and accessibility in education.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video is a recording of an academic panel discussion featuring experts from various institutions, providing firsthand accounts and institutional experiences. The content is well-structured and grounded in practical initiatives, though it lacks formal citations and peer-reviewed references.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • UTEC Inclusion Policy — Mentioned by Tatiana Stanisich as a recent institutional policy guiding inclusion efforts.
  • Early Childhood Inclusive Education Course — Referenced by Andrea Barcia as a self-administered course available on the MEC platform.

Concurring Sources

  • UNESCO Guidelines for Inclusion — Aligns with the panel's emphasis on inclusive education as a right and the need for systemic change.

Dissenting Sources

  • Critique of Digital Inclusion Policies — Some scholars argue that digital inclusion initiatives may not address underlying structural inequalities, a perspective not explored in the video.

Contribution & Novelties

The video contributes to the discourse on educational inclusion by showcasing concrete, collaborative initiatives in Uruguay. It highlights the importance of interinstitutional cooperation and the need to move beyond traditional notions of literacy, particularly in relation to deaf communities. The panel emphasizes the role of technology in facilitating accessibility and the necessity of training educators. It also brings attention to the often-overlooked area of early childhood inclusive education.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Universal Design for Learning — A framework to improve and optimize teaching and learning for all people based on scientific insights into how humans learn.
  • Deaf culture — Provides background on the cultural and linguistic identity of deaf communities, relevant to Peluso’s discussion.
  • Assistive technology — Overview of technologies that support individuals with disabilities, central to the digital inclusion efforts described.

134 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, reflecting the video's solid content and institutional grounding. The technical level is moderate, indicating that while the content is accessible, it does not delve deeply into technical aspects. Overall, the video is a reliable and informative resource on inclusive education practices.

Reliability 8/10