Google aplastó a todos con Gemini 3, la mejor IA de 2025

Google aplastó a todos con Gemini 3, la mejor IA de 2025

🎙 EDteam 👥 1.0M 📅 November 21, 2025 ⏱ 25 min 👁 82K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-02
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Gemini 3GoogleAIreasoningmultimodal

Summary

The video, published by EDteam on November 21, 2025, reviews the surprise launch of Google’s Gemini 3 AI model. The presenter, a tech educator, begins by noting the unexpected release date and highlights Google’s claims: advanced reasoning that understands implicit intent, non-condescending responses, aggressive multimodality (including video understanding), and the ability to build complex applications via Canvas. He also mentions Antigravity, Google’s code editor, and cites impressive user numbers (2 billion monthly AI Overviews users, 650 million Gemini app users, 13 million developers). The core of the video is a live test: he asks Gemini 3 to create an SVG animation explaining VPNs, which it does successfully, even iterating to add realistic nodes and a map. He then tests it with a hand-drawn diagram, which it interprets to create a 3D animation using Three.js, showing its reasoning process. He compares with Claude, which also produces a similar animation but fails to follow the specific geographic instructions. Next, he tests Gemini 3’s ability to create an interactive animation explaining why triangle angles sum to 180 degrees, but the first attempt is insufficient; after a more detailed prompt, it uses a ’tearing corners’ method. The presenter concludes that Gemini 3 is impressive and potentially state-of-the-art, but notes it’s not perfect and plans deeper testing later. The video is sponsored by EDteam’s Black Friday sale, which is mentioned at the beginning and middle.

230 words

Critical Evaluation

The video provides a valuable hands-on demonstration of Gemini 3’s capabilities, particularly in generating code and animations from simple prompts. The presenter’s approach of testing with real-world tasks, such as creating an SVG animation of a VPN and an interactive geometry demonstration, offers concrete evidence of the model’s performance. The transparency about failures (e.g., the map not being accurate) adds credibility. However, the evaluation is limited by the short time since release; the presenter admits he hasn’t tested deeply. The video relies heavily on Google’s promotional claims, such as benchmark scores and user numbers, without independent verification. The comparison with Claude is useful but not exhaustive. The argumentation is generally sound, but the tone is enthusiastic and somewhat promotional, which may bias the assessment. The sources cited are limited to EDteam’s own links, with no external references to Google’s official documentation or research papers. The title is slightly sensationalist but the content largely supports it. Overall, the video is informative for a general audience interested in AI developments, but it lacks critical depth and rigorous sourcing.

176 words

Title / Content Match

The title is somewhat sensationalist ('aplastó a todos') but the video does demonstrate Gemini 3's capabilities and compares it with Claude, so it is largely accurate.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video is a hands-on review of Gemini 3, showing real-time tests and comparisons with Claude. The presenter is transparent about limitations (e.g., not testing deeply, some failures). However, the content is promotional in tone, relies on Google's claims, and lacks independent verification or citations. The benchmarks mentioned are from Google's announcement, not independently verified.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • OpenAI

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a practical, real-time evaluation of Gemini 3’s capabilities, particularly in generating code and animations from minimal prompts. It highlights the model’s ability to interpret hand-drawn diagrams and produce complex 3D visualizations, which is a novel demonstration. The comparison with Claude provides a useful benchmark. The presenter’s emphasis on the model’s reasoning process is insightful.

Pour aller plus loin :

99 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced performance across dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quantity and technical level, but lower in reliability due to promotional tone and lack of independent verification.

Reliability 5/10

💬 Positif. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la majorité exprime un enthousiasme marqué pour Gemini 3, avec des retours positifs sur ses capacités et des comparaisons favorables à Google, bien que quelques utilisateurs signalent des limites ou des erreurs.