Blâmez Amixem, ce salaud m'a corrompACHETEZ SPACEFOX !!!

Blâmez Amixem, ce salaud m'a corrompACHETEZ SPACEFOX !!!

🎙 AstronoGeek 👥 94K 📅 January 8, 2021 ⏱ 37 min 👁 66K 📄 vlog 🧭 2026-08-04
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

spacefoxunboxingastronomical eventsCPMchannel updates

Summary

In this vlog, AstronoGeek (Arnaud) welcomes viewers back after the holiday season and discusses his plans for the year. He begins by unboxing a package from Maxime (Amixem) containing the new SpaceFox ‘Supernova’ collection, including a cap, hoodie, and jacket, which he tries on and praises for quality. He then talks about potential changes to his channel, such as possibly reducing the frequency of vlogs and focusing on more substantial content. He explains the concept of CPM (cost per mille) and how it affects his video scheduling, noting that January is a low-earning period, so he plans to release less clickable videos early in the year and save his bigger productions for later. He also discusses upcoming video topics, including a video on light pollution (which won a Twitter poll), a program of astronomical events for 2021, galaxy classification, the ‘art toys’ (likely a mishearing of ‘artifacts’ or ‘art’?), and a debunk of the Chauvet UFO case. He mentions other planned videos like the rarest phenomenon in the universe, season 2 of Hermès, and sounds of Phobos. He encourages viewers to subscribe to Studio de Poche to help him reach a milestone.

192 words

Critical Evaluation

This vlog serves primarily as a personal update and promotional vehicle rather than an educational science video. The scientific content is minimal, limited to brief mentions of upcoming topics and a simplified explanation of CPM. The unboxing segment is lengthy and focuses on merchandise, which may appeal to fans but adds little scientific value. The creator’s credibility as a science communicator is established, but this video does not showcase his typical rigor. The discussion of CPM is accurate but basic, and the mention of astronomical events is vague. The video’s strength lies in its authenticity and engagement with the community, as seen in the comments. However, for viewers seeking scientific content, this video is disappointing. The title is clickbait, but it aligns with the vlog’s casual tone. Overall, the video is well-produced and entertaining for fans, but it lacks the depth expected from a science channel.

146 words

Title / Content Match

The title is clickbait and humorous, referencing a collaboration and promoting merchandise, which matches the vlog's casual and promotional tone.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video is a vlog with personal anecdotes and plans for upcoming content, not a scientific presentation. It includes some factual information about YouTube monetization (CPM) and astronomical events, but the primary focus is on merchandise unboxing and channel updates. The creator is known for science communication, but this video lacks rigorous scientific content.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

This video provides a personal update and behind-the-scenes look at the creator’s plans, offering little new scientific information. Its main value is for fans interested in the channel’s direction and merchandise.

Pour aller plus loin :

66 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores in information quantity and quality, low technical level, and moderate reliability, reflecting the video's focus on personal updates rather than scientific depth.

Reliability 6/10

💬 Très positif : Les commentaires sont extrêmement positifs, avec des fans exprimant leur soutien, leur amusement et leur abonnement au Studio de Poche. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la grande majorité est enthousiaste et encourageante.