Conformal correlators with abelian monodromies

Conformal correlators with abelian monodromies

🎙 Sylvain Ribault 👥 5K 📅 June 15, 2026 ⏱ 78 min 👁 39 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

conformal correlatorsmonodromycluster connectivityoperator product expansionconformal blocks

Summary

The talk introduces a generalization of conformal field theory (CFT) called conformal correlator systems, designed to describe non-local observables such as cluster connectivities in critical statistical models. These observables are conformally invariant but do not necessarily belong to a CFT, as they lack a local operator product expansion (OPE). The speaker, Sylvain Ribault, proposes weaker axioms: correlators are conformally covariant and satisfy a ‘correlator expansion’ that reduces N-point functions to 4-point functions, instead of the usual reduction to 3-point functions in CFT. In two dimensions, the spectrum is not constrained by modular invariance, allowing spins to take arbitrary complex values, leading to nontrivial monodromies. The talk demonstrates that sphere 4-point functions and torus 1-point functions are subject to monodromy constraints. Examples include explicit free-field correlators and more complex ones from critical loop models. The framework is shown to be stronger than mere crossing symmetry, as it implies nonlinear relations among structure constants. The talk concludes by discussing potential applications, such as the construction of the UV theory via the bootstrap approach.

171 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides a novel conceptual framework that extends CFT to accommodate non-local observables. The argumentation is rigorous, building from axioms to consequences, and includes explicit examples. The speaker carefully distinguishes between OPE, correlator expansion, and crossing symmetry, highlighting the hierarchy of assumptions. The value lies in offering a new tool for studying critical phenomena and potentially resolving issues in bootstrap constructions. The argumentation is solid, with clear logical steps and a demonstration of the framework’s non-triviality.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk is a research presentation, not a review, and does not cite external sources in the description. The speaker references the work of Roda and Santa (2020-2025) on the UV theory, but no URLs are provided. The title accurately reflects the content. The scientific rigor is high, with a clear mathematical framework and derivations. However, the lack of published references limits immediate verification. The talk is aimed at specialists, but the content is presented with clarity.

169 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on conformal correlators with abelian monodromies, which is the central topic of the talk.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk presents original research by a recognized expert in the field, with a rigorous mathematical framework and explicit examples. The presentation is technical and assumes prior knowledge, but the reasoning is clear and well-structured. The claims are supported by derivations and examples, though the lack of published references in the description limits immediate verification.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The talk introduces a new framework for conformal correlators that relaxes the axioms of CFT, allowing for non-local observables and arbitrary complex spins. This is a significant conceptual advance, as it provides a rigorous way to handle observables like cluster connectivities that are not captured by standard CFT. The framework also offers new constraints via monodromy, which could be used in bootstrap calculations.

Pour aller plus loin :

125 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in technical level and information quality, reflecting the advanced and rigorous nature of the talk. The quantity of information is also high, but the overall note is slightly lower due to the niche topic and lack of accessible references.

Reliability 8/10