Quantifying uncertainties in computer models An overview - Merlin KELLER - EDF R&D

Quantifying uncertainties in computer models An overview - Merlin KELLER - EDF R&D

🎙 Merlin KELLER (EDF R&D) 👥 5K 📅 October 9, 2025 ⏱ 67 min 👁 125 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

uncertainty quantificationcomputer modelssensitivity analysisMonte Carloprobabilistic modeling

Summary

The talk by Merlin Keller from EDF R&D provides a comprehensive overview of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for computer models. It begins with the motivation: ensuring safety and reliability of power plants, optimizing maintenance, and supporting decision-making under uncertainty. The core methodology is presented as a step-by-step process: (1) defining the quantity of interest (e.g., mean, variance, failure probability), (2) probabilistic modeling of uncertain inputs using data and expert knowledge, including marginal distributions and copulas for dependence, (3) propagating uncertainties through the model using methods like Taylor approximation or Monte Carlo, with specialized techniques for rare events (e.g., FORM/SORM, importance sampling), and (4) sensitivity analysis to identify influential inputs, using screening methods (e.g., Morris) and variance-based measures (e.g., Sobol indices). The talk also mentions advanced topics like meta-models, robust optimization, and open-source tools (OpenTURNS, Persalys, Uranie). The presentation is aimed at engineers and researchers, providing a practical framework for UQ in industrial applications.

152 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides a high-level but comprehensive overview of UQ methodology, emphasizing practical applicability in industrial settings. The argumentation is clear and logical, building from motivation to methodology to advanced topics. The speaker effectively illustrates concepts with real-world examples from nuclear safety and hydrology, enhancing credibility. The value lies in its synthesis of established methods and its emphasis on a unified framework that can be applied across various problems. The argumentation is solid, though it does not delve into deep technical details, which is appropriate for an overview talk.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk demonstrates scientific rigor by referencing established guidelines (e.g., NRC guides, metrology guides) and mentioning collaborative efforts with academic and industrial partners. The speaker mentions specific tools (OpenTURNS, Persalys, Uranie) and publications, though no direct URLs are provided in the description. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a broad overview of UQ. The talk is well-structured and credible, though it lacks explicit citations to specific papers, which is common for such overview presentations.

180 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a comprehensive overview of uncertainty quantification in computer models.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

Talk by an expert from EDF R&D, presenting established UQ methodology and referencing institutional guidelines and tools. No formal peer review, but high practical authority.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • OpenTURNS — Mentioned as an open-source UQ toolbox developed by EDF and others.
  • Persalys — Graphical interface for OpenTURNS, mentioned in the talk.
  • Uranie — Complementary software developed by CEA, mentioned in the talk.

Concurring Sources

  • OpenTURNS — The talk mentions OpenTURNS as a tool for UQ; the official documentation confirms its capabilities.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk provides a clear and structured overview of UQ methodology, synthesizing established techniques into a practical framework for industrial applications. It emphasizes the importance of each step and highlights common pitfalls, such as the need for careful probabilistic modeling and the distinction between central and tail quantities. The presentation is valuable for engineers and researchers new to UQ, offering a roadmap for implementation.

Pour aller plus loin :

116 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical depth, reflecting the overview nature of the talk. The balance suggests a solid, accessible introduction to UQ.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.