Plugging Energy Efficiency First in CBA Why and How (Enefirst Plus Webinar)

Plugging Energy Efficiency First in CBA Why and How (Enefirst Plus Webinar)

🎙 IEECP Climate and Energy Hub 👥 197 📅 January 5, 2026 ⏱ 102 min 👁 70 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Energy Efficiency FirstCost-Benefit AnalysisEU Energy PolicyEnergy PlanningENEFIRST Plus

Summary

The webinar, organized by the ENEFIRST Plus project, focuses on integrating the Energy Efficiency First (EE1st) principle into Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). The session begins with an introduction to the policy background, highlighting the principle’s adoption in EU legislation since 2018 and its reinforcement in the 2023 Energy Efficiency Directive. The main presentation by Tim Mandel from Fraunhofer ISI introduces a new CBA Guidebook and Excel Tool developed by the project. The guidebook addresses nine key issues to properly reflect EE1st in CBA, including considering the full range of energy efficiency solutions, valuing multiple benefits, and avoiding supply-side bias. The webinar also presents a pilot case from Croatia, where EE1st was applied to a CBA for electricity transmission grid investment, demonstrating the practical impact of the methodology. The discussion emphasizes the importance of a societal perspective, proper discount rates, and distributional effects. The session concludes with an open discussion and plans for a follow-up webinar in January.

156 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides valuable insights into the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency First principle in Cost-Benefit Analysis. The argumentation is solid, grounded in EU policy and project experience. The speakers clearly explain the rationale behind the nine issues and illustrate them with concrete examples. The presentation of the Excel tool and the Croatian pilot case adds practical value, showing how the methodology can be applied. The discussion is well-structured and addresses potential challenges, such as supply-side bias and the need for a societal perspective. Overall, the content is informative and persuasive, though it could benefit from more quantitative examples and a deeper dive into specific case studies.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The webinar demonstrates a high level of scientific rigor, with clear references to EU legislation (e.g., Energy Efficiency Directive, Governance Regulation) and project resources. The sources cited are credible and directly relevant to the topic. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of integrating EE1st into CBA. The presentation is well-organized and the speakers are knowledgeable. The main limitation is the lack of peer-reviewed sources, but this is typical for a webinar format. The adéquation between title and content is strong, with no significant discrepancies.

213 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the webinar's focus on integrating the Energy Efficiency First principle into Cost-Benefit Analysis, with a clear 'why' and 'how' structure.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The webinar presents expert insights from the ENEFIRST Plus project, with clear references to EU legislation and project resources. The content is well-structured and grounded in practical experience, though it is primarily a discussion of methodologies rather than peer-reviewed research.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The webinar provides a novel contribution by translating the Energy Efficiency First principle into practical CBA guidance, addressing a gap between policy ambition and quantitative analysis. The nine-issue framework offers a structured approach to integrate EE1st into various CBA contexts, from grid planning to heating and cooling assessments. The accompanying Excel tool and pilot case demonstrate the methodology’s applicability.

Pour aller plus loin :

102 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level. This indicates a well-balanced presentation that is both informative and credible, though it may require some background knowledge to fully appreciate the technical aspects.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.