Electrons on Superfluid Helium with Nick Farina

Electrons on Superfluid Helium with Nick Farina

🎙 Sebastian Hassinger 👥 314 📅 June 22, 2026 ⏱ 42 min 👁 235 📄 interview 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

electrons on heliumqubitssuperfluid heliumCMOSquantum computing

Summary

In this episode of The New Quantum Era, host Sebastian Hassinger interviews Nick Farina, CEO of EeroQ, the only company commercializing electrons-on-helium qubits. Farina recounts his unconventional journey from software entrepreneur to quantum startup founder, sparked by a friendship with physicist Johannes Pollanen. He explains the physics: electrons trapped above a superfluid helium film on a CMOS chip, controlled via circuit QED. The company pivoted from motional to spin qubits after Steve Lyon joined as CTO, predicting coherence times over 10 seconds. EeroQ’s philosophy is ‘build a quantum computer in reverse,’ starting from a million-qubit architecture. Recent achievements include a Physical Review X paper on single-electron control above 1 K, a January 2026 result on controlling up to a million electrons with fewer than 50 control lines, and a Nature Physics paper demonstrating strong coupling between a microwave photon and a single electron. However, no two-qubit gate has been demonstrated yet, with a tape-out target of ~10,000 qubits by late 2028. The conversation also covers the company’s integration into Chicago’s quantum ecosystem and the advantages of their approach over silicon spin qubits.

182 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The interview provides valuable insights into a niche quantum computing modality, offering a clear explanation of the physics and engineering challenges. Farina’s arguments for the scalability of electrons-on-helium are compelling, emphasizing CMOS compatibility and the potential for high qubit densities. However, some claims, such as coherence times and the ease of scaling, are presented optimistically without full experimental backing. The host appropriately challenges the lack of a two-qubit gate, providing a balanced perspective.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The episode references several peer-reviewed papers and company publications, including a Nature Physics paper (DOI: 10.1038/s41567-026-03342-z) and a Physical Review X paper (DOI: 10.1103/vcl7-73ms). The title accurately reflects the content. The discussion is scientifically rigorous, with clear distinctions between demonstrated results and future goals. The host’s framing of the company’s status is honest, noting the absence of a two-qubit gate.

148 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on electrons on superfluid helium and features Nick Farina.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The interview provides a detailed and honest overview of EeroQ's technology and progress, with references to peer-reviewed papers and specific results. However, some claims (e.g., coherence times, scaling potential) are forward-looking and not yet fully demonstrated. The host explicitly notes the lack of a two-qubit gate, adding balance.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The interview provides a unique perspective on a relatively obscure quantum computing modality, offering insights into the technical challenges and strategic decisions of a startup in this space. It highlights the potential of electrons-on-helium to combine advantages of other platforms, such as fast gates and CMOS manufacturability. The discussion of ‘building a quantum computer in reverse’ is a novel approach to hardware development.

Pour aller plus loin :

99 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced performance across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quantity and technical level, reflecting the in-depth technical discussion. The lower scores in information quality and reliability are due to the forward-looking nature of some claims and the lack of a demonstrated two-qubit gate.

Reliability 7/10