CAOS 2025 - 3 | Rovereto, May 7-9 | Rhodri Cusack

CAOS 2025 - 3 | Rovereto, May 7-9 | Rhodri Cusack

🎙 Rhodri Cusack 👥 2K 📅 November 14, 2025 ⏱ 72 min 👁 17 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

infantfMRIventral visual streamrepresentational similarity analysisdevelopment

Summary

Rhodri Cusack presents research on the development of the infant ventral visual stream using awake fMRI. He introduces the ‘foundation model’ hypothesis, suggesting that human infants’ prolonged helplessness allows for the development of general-purpose representations. The study involves a large cohort of 2-month-olds (134) and 9-month-olds (92) who watched pictures of 12 categories (animate, small inanimate, large inanimate). Using representational similarity analysis (RSA), they find that even at 2 months, infants show distinctions between animate and inanimate objects in the ventral visual cortex, with semantic representations present. They also observe a medial-to-lateral maturation gradient, with lateral occipital regions showing weaker and less mature responses in infants. Comparisons with deep neural networks (both supervised and unsupervised) suggest that early layers model V1 well, while later layers model ventral visual cortex. The findings indicate early semantic information in infants and a specific developmental trajectory, potentially reconciling discrepancies between EEG and fMRI studies.

150 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights into the development of the visual system, using a robust methodology (large sample, awake fMRI, RSA) and addressing a fundamental question about innate vs. learned components. The argumentation is solid, with careful consideration of potential confounds (e.g., noise ceilings, signal-to-noise) and comparisons with DNN models. The speaker acknowledges limitations and alternative interpretations, strengthening the credibility of the conclusions.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk demonstrates scientific rigor through detailed methods, including participant recruitment, data acquisition, and analysis. The use of established atlases (Julich) and comparison with DNN models adds credibility. The title accurately reflects the content. The speaker cites relevant literature (e.g., Turk-Browne, Saxe, Grill-Spector) and acknowledges the work of others. No external sources are provided in the description beyond the conference link, but the talk itself references key studies.

146 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the talk focuses on innate and learned components of the infant ventral visual stream, presenting evidence for early semantic representations and medial-to-lateral maturation.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk presents original fMRI data from a substantial infant cohort (134 two-month-olds, 92 followed up at 9 months) with high success rates and rigorous methods (RSA, DNN comparisons, noise ceilings). The speaker is an established researcher, and the work is part of an ERC-funded project. However, the talk is a conference presentation, not peer-reviewed, and some interpretations are preliminary.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Turk-Browne lab infant fMRI studies — Prior work on infant visual cortex development using fMRI.
  • Saxe lab infant fMRI studies — Research on category selectivity in infant visual cortex.

Contribution & Novelties

This talk contributes novel empirical evidence on the early development of the ventral visual stream, showing that semantic representations (e.g., animacy) are present as early as 2 months of age, earlier than previously thought. It also identifies a medial-to-lateral maturation gradient, which may reconcile discrepancies between EEG and fMRI findings. The use of DNN models provides a computational framework for understanding the nature of these representations.

Pour aller plus loin :

102 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores across all dimensions, indicating a well-rounded and rigorous presentation. The talk excels in information quantity and quality, with strong technical depth and high reliability, reflecting the speaker's expertise and the robust study design.

Reliability 8/10