How to conduct a Systematic Literature Review or Meta-analysis?

How to conduct a Systematic Literature Review or Meta-analysis?

🎙 Dr. Asif’s Mol. Biology 👥 22K 📅 April 9, 2026 ⏱ 23 min 👁 833 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

SLRmeta-analysisPRISMASciSpaceAI agent

Summary

The video is a tutorial by Dr. Asif’s Mol. Biology demonstrating how to use the AI tool SciSpace to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) or meta-analysis in about 60 minutes. The presenter walks through the process step-by-step, starting with writing an effective prompt that includes the keyword ‘SLR’ to activate the specialized agent. The agent then guides the user through formulating PICO questions, setting inclusion and exclusion criteria, selecting databases, and executing the search. The tool automatically screens papers based on title and abstract, extracts data, and generates a PRISMA flow diagram and a comprehensive report. The presenter shows how to adjust criteria to include more papers and how to download the results as a Word document. Additionally, the video highlights other skills of the SciSpace agent, such as clinical trial search, web search, grant research, presentation generation, and website generation. The presenter discusses pricing plans and recommends the ‘Max’ plan for meta-analysis, noting that the tool is not available in the free version. The video includes affiliate links and discount codes, indicating a promotional aspect.

177 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a practical demonstration of an AI tool for conducting systematic literature reviews, which is valuable for researchers unfamiliar with such tools. The step-by-step walkthrough is clear and easy to follow, and the presenter shows real examples of the tool’s output, including PRISMA diagrams and reports. However, the argumentation is largely one-sided, focusing on the tool’s capabilities without critically assessing its limitations, such as potential biases in AI-generated content, the need for manual verification, or comparison with traditional methods. The promotional tone, including discount codes and pricing comparisons, may undermine the objectivity of the presentation.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any external scientific sources, relying solely on the demonstration of the SciSpace tool. The only source mentioned is the tool itself, with an affiliate link in the description. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a tutorial on conducting a systematic literature review. However, the scientific rigor is limited because the video does not discuss the underlying methodology of systematic reviews beyond mentioning PRISMA guidelines, nor does it provide evidence of the tool’s accuracy or reliability. The lack of critical evaluation and reliance on promotional material reduces the overall scientific credibility.

209 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a tutorial on conducting a systematic literature review using an AI tool.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video is a tutorial demonstrating the use of a specific AI tool (SciSpace) for conducting systematic literature reviews. It provides a practical walkthrough but lacks critical evaluation of the tool's limitations or comparison with established methods. The content is largely promotional, with affiliate links and discount codes, which may bias the presentation.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • SciSpace — The video demonstrates the use of SciSpace's AI agent for conducting systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses.

Concurring Sources

  • PRISMA Statement — The video references PRISMA guidelines for conducting systematic literature reviews.

Contribution & Novelties

The video introduces a novel AI-powered tool that automates the systematic literature review process, potentially saving researchers significant time. It demonstrates the integration of PRISMA guidelines and provides a user-friendly interface for conducting SLRs. However, the novelty is primarily in the tool itself, not in the video’s content, which is a tutorial. The video does not contribute new scientific knowledge but rather showcases a technological solution.

Pour aller plus loin :

99 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with the highest in quantity of information and the lowest in reliability. This suggests the video provides a substantial amount of practical information but lacks scientific rigor and critical evaluation, making it more of a promotional tutorial than a scholarly resource.

Reliability 5/10