Séminaire RéSCits procité 31 octobre 2025

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The seminar provides valuable insights into the practical implementation of a living lab approach for social inclusion of older adults. The argumentation is solid, grounded in a clear theoretical framework (European Network of Living Labs) and a structured methodology (embedded case studies, research-action design). The presenters effectively demonstrate the value of co-creation and stakeholder engagement, providing concrete examples of initiatives and their development. The discussion of challenges and lessons learned adds depth to the presentation, though the argumentation could be strengthened by more explicit evidence of outcomes and impacts.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is evident in the systematic approach to establishing the living lab, including needs assessment, stakeholder consultation, and iterative design. The sources cited are primarily internal project documents and references to the European Network of Living Labs, but specific academic references are not explicitly mentioned in the transcript. The title accurately reflects the content, and the presentation is well-structured and coherent. The lack of detailed citations may limit the ability to verify claims, but the project’s alignment with established methodologies lends credibility.

The title accurately reflects the content: a seminar on the Quartier Innovant living lab project, presented by the researchers involved.

7/10

The seminar presents a well-structured research project (living lab) with clear methodology, stakeholder engagement, and concrete outcomes. However, it is a presentation rather than a peer-reviewed publication, and the evidence is primarily descriptive.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 02:00Introduction of the speakers and the seminar series.
• 05:00Background of the project: origins at CRIUGM and the goal to create an age-friendly neighborhood.
• 10:00Consultation with community stakeholders and identification of key needs.
• 15:00Definition of living lab and its application in the project.
• 20:00Description of the three main themes: cognition, communication, and mobility.
• 25:00Methodology: embedded case studies and research-action design.
• 30:00Examples of co-creation workshops and principles guiding them.
• 35:00Overview of specific initiatives and their development.
• 40:00Discussion of outcomes and lessons learned.
• 45:00Q&A session and closing remarks.

• European Network of Living Labs — Definition of living lab used in the project.

• European Network of Living Labs — The project aligns with the ENoll definition of living labs.