Je passe le BAC PHILO avec CHATGPT (on vise le 20 !)

Je passe le BAC PHILO avec CHATGPT (on vise le 20 !)

by Ludo Salenne

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought AI — Models & Research UYQArtificial intelligence (AI)UYQFGenerative artificial intelligence
🎙 Ludo Salenne 👥 267K 📅 June 14, 2023 ⏱ 16 min 👁 4K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-21
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

ChatGPTBac PhilodissertationAIexam preparation

Summary

In this video, Ludo Salenne, a French YouTuber, attempts to pass the 2023 French philosophy baccalaureate (Bac Philo) exam using ChatGPT. He starts by presenting the four exam subjects (two for the general track and two for the technological track) and asks ChatGPT, positioned as a philosophy professor, to recommend the best subject for each track. ChatGPT suggests ‘Is happiness a matter of reason?’ for the general track and ‘Does art teach us something?’ for the technological track, based on the availability of philosophical material and the potential for a well-structured essay. The creator then asks ChatGPT to outline a step-by-step methodology for writing a philosophy dissertation, which includes understanding the subject, brainstorming, formulating a thesis, and revising. He requests detailed essay plans for both recommended subjects, which ChatGPT provides with introductions, parts, and conclusions. Next, he asks for relevant philosophical quotes for each part of the plans, and ChatGPT, using plugins, generates quotes from philosophers like Kant, Voltaire, and Freud. The video concludes with a humorous segment where the creator asks ChatGPT to generate provocative or cheeky one-line answers for each subject, inspired by an urban legend of a student who got a 20/20 for writing a single bold sentence. Throughout, the creator emphasizes the practical use of ChatGPT for exam preparation, while also acknowledging the importance of following traditional essay conventions for a good grade.

227 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a practical, step-by-step demonstration of using ChatGPT for exam preparation, which is valuable for students and educators interested in AI applications. The argumentation is based on the creator’s personal experience and the AI’s responses, which are presented as illustrative examples rather than definitive advice. The creator does not critically evaluate the quality of the AI-generated content, but he does note that the AI’s suggestions are conventional and that a real exam would require more depth. The video’s value lies in its demonstration of prompt engineering and the potential of AI as a study aid, but it lacks a rigorous analysis of the philosophical concepts or the reliability of the AI’s output.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any scientific or academic sources. The only sources mentioned are the creator’s own videos and a link to his training course, which are promotional. The title accurately describes the content, which is a casual experiment rather than a rigorous study. The video’s scientific rigor is low, as it relies on anecdotal evidence and AI-generated content without verification. The creator does not provide any critical analysis of the AI’s suggestions or the philosophical validity of the generated essays. The video is best viewed as an entertainment or tutorial piece, not as a reliable educational resource.

228 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the creator takes the 2023 French philosophy baccalaureate exam with the help of ChatGPT.

Quality & Reliability

5/10

The video is a practical demonstration of using ChatGPT for philosophy exam preparation. It is not a scientific source, and the information is anecdotal and based on personal experience. The AI-generated content is not verified for accuracy, and the video includes promotional elements for the creator's own training course.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • ChatGPT in Education — Discusses the use of ChatGPT in educational settings, including its benefits and challenges.

Dissenting Sources

  • AI-generated content and academic integrity — The video's approach of using AI to generate essays could be seen as conflicting with academic integrity principles, which emphasize original work and proper citation.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a practical, real-time demonstration of using ChatGPT for a specific academic task (philosophy exam preparation). It showcases prompt engineering techniques, such as assigning a role and asking for structured plans and quotes. The novelty lies in the application of AI to a traditional educational exercise, highlighting both its potential and limitations. However, the video does not provide a deep analysis of the philosophical content or the AI’s reliability.

Pour aller plus loin :

108 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores for information quantity and technical level, reflecting the video's practical tutorial nature. The low reliability score indicates that the content is not scientifically rigorous and should be viewed as an informal demonstration.

Reliability 3/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.