Je claque 1512€ par mois dans les IA — je fais le tri !

Je claque 1512€ par mois dans les IA — je fais le tri !

by Ludo Salenne

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought AI & Society UBDigital and Information technology: general topicsUBJDigital and information technologies: social and ethical aspects
🎙 Ludo Salenne 👥 267K 📅 March 25, 2024 ⏱ 39 min 👁 19K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-21
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

AI toolssubscription reviewChatGPT PlusCopilot ProGemini Advanced

Summary

In this video, Ludo Salenne, a content creator focused on AI tools, reveals that he spends 1512€ per month on various AI subscriptions. He categorizes them into generalist, specific, and original tools, then reviews each one, giving pros and cons. He starts with ChatGPT Plus, which he considers essential for access to GPT-4 and advanced features, despite a message limit. He then criticizes ChatGPT Team for its lack of features and high cost, deciding to cancel it. Copilot Pro is seen as a good option for Office 365 users, but with inferior performance compared to ChatGPT Plus. Claude Pro is dismissed due to unavailability in France, and Google Gemini Advanced is deemed disappointing in French, though promising for English users. He also reviews Midjourney, Canva AI, Perplexity AI, Tubebuddy, HubSpot AI, Make, Grok AI, and Suno AI, providing insights on their value. The video concludes with a summary of which subscriptions he will keep and the savings he will make.

160 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable, practical information for viewers considering AI subscriptions, with a transparent breakdown of costs and honest assessments. The creator’s arguments are based on his personal experience and testing, which adds credibility, though they are subjective and not backed by external data. He clearly explains the pros and cons of each tool, helping viewers make informed decisions. The argumentation is coherent and well-structured, though it relies heavily on anecdotal evidence.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is a personal review, so it does not cite external sources, but it does reference his own tutorial videos for further information. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video is well-organized with clear chapters. The creator’s methodology is transparent, as he explains how he calculated his costs and why he made his decisions. However, the lack of external references and the potential for bias (e.g., affiliate links) slightly reduce the scientific rigor.

163 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the creator reviews his AI subscriptions totaling 1512€/month and decides which to keep or cancel.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a personal, experience-based review of AI subscriptions, with transparent cost breakdowns and practical pros/cons. However, it lacks external citations, and the creator's own biases and limited testing conditions affect objectivity.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • ChatGPT Plus vs Team comparison — Official pricing and feature comparison for ChatGPT plans, supporting the creator's claims about message limits and features.
  • Microsoft Copilot Pro features — Official documentation on Copilot Pro, confirming its integration with Office 365 and GPT-4 access.

Dissenting Sources

  • Google Gemini Advanced review

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a unique, personal perspective on the cost and value of multiple AI subscriptions, which is rare in the AI content space. It provides a practical framework for evaluating AI tools based on individual needs and budgets. The creator’s transparency about his own spending and decisions adds authenticity.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • ChatGPT pricing — Official pricing for ChatGPT plans, useful for verifying costs.
  • Microsoft Copilot — Official page for Microsoft Copilot, detailing its integration with Office 365.
  • Google Gemini — Official page for Google Gemini, including advanced features.
  • Anthropic Claude — Official page for Claude, with information on availability and features.
  • Perplexity AI — Official site for Perplexity AI, an AI-powered search engine.

117 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and technical level, reflecting the video's comprehensive coverage of AI tools. However, the lower scores in quality of information and reliability indicate that the content is subjective and lacks external validation.

Reliability 6/10

💬 Très positif. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, les spectateurs expriment une gratitude marquée pour la transparence et la clarté de la vidéo, avec de nombreux remerciements et des demandes de conseils supplémentaires.