The Old Playbook of Power and Influence Is Different Now

The Old Playbook of Power and Influence Is Different Now

🎙 Columbia Journalism Review 👥 169 📅 May 14, 2026 ⏱ 57 min 👁 118 📄 debate 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

political influencethink tanksjournalismconservatismmedia

Summary

In this episode of the Journalism 2050 podcast, hosts Emily Bell and Heather Chaplin discuss the changing nature of political influence with historian Kim Phillips-Fein and PhD candidate Samuel Earle. They trace the historical development of conservative influence from the 1930s through the Reagan era, focusing on the role of think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute and the Mont Pelerin Society. The conversation highlights how the right built a long-term infrastructure to shape public discourse, contrasting it with today’s more fragmented and digital landscape. They explore the implications for journalism, noting how think tanks were often quoted uncritically by the press. The discussion also touches on the rise of technocracy and the fracturing of the right, as seen in Phillips-Fein’s forthcoming book ‘Country of Lords’. The guests consider what the left can learn from the right’s success and how influence is now wielded through social media and direct political engagement.

151 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The episode provides valuable insights into the historical evolution of political influence, drawing on the guests’ expertise and published works. The argumentation is solid, with clear examples and logical progression from the New Deal era to the present. The discussion effectively connects historical strategies to contemporary phenomena, such as Elon Musk’s dismissal of traditional press inquiries. The guests offer nuanced perspectives, acknowledging both the successes and limitations of past approaches. The value lies in its historical depth and the critical examination of how influence is cultivated, which is highly relevant for understanding current media and political dynamics.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is high, as the guests are established scholars with relevant publications. The sources mentioned include the guests’ own books and historical documents, though specific citations are not provided in the episode. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on the shift in influence strategies. The discussion is well-structured and grounded in historical evidence, though it would benefit from more explicit references to primary sources. Overall, the episode maintains a high standard of intellectual rigor.

189 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the core theme of the episode: the transformation of political influence strategies from think tanks and traditional media to more direct, digital, and disruptive methods.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The discussion features two established authors and academics (Kim Phillips-Fein and Samuel Earle) who provide historical context and analysis. The claims are well-supported by their published works and historical evidence. The podcast format allows for nuanced discussion, but the lack of direct citations to specific sources in the episode reduces the score slightly.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Invisible Hands: The Businessman's Crusade Against the New Deal — Kim Phillips-Fein's book, discussed as a foundational text on the conservative movement.
  • Tory Nation: The Dark Legacy of the World’s Most Successful Political Party — Samuel Earle's book, referenced in the context of British conservatism.
  • Country of Lords — Kim Phillips-Fein's forthcoming book, mentioned as a continuation of her analysis.
  • The Road to Serfdom — Friedrich Hayek's influential book, cited as inspiration for conservative think tanks.
  • American Enterprise Institute — Think tank discussed as part of the conservative infrastructure.

Concurring Sources

  • Invisible Hands: The Businessman's Crusade Against the New Deal — Provides historical evidence for the conservative movement's strategies.
  • Tory Nation: The Dark Legacy of the World’s Most Successful Political Party — Offers a comparative perspective on British conservatism.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The episode offers a valuable historical perspective on the evolution of political influence, connecting the dots between early conservative organizing and contemporary digital disruption. It provides a nuanced analysis of how think tanks and media have interacted over time, and how the right’s long-term strategies have shaped public discourse. The discussion also highlights the fracturing of the right and the rise of technocracy, offering fresh insights into current political dynamics.

Pour aller plus loin :

124 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a moderate technical level. This indicates a well-informed discussion that is accessible to a general audience but still provides depth. The balance between historical analysis and contemporary relevance is strong, making it a valuable resource for understanding political influence.

Reliability 8/10