GEMER : De la culture matérielle du marin

GEMER : De la culture matérielle du marin

🎙 Caroline Bidon, Denis Leguen 👥 46K 📅 June 19, 2026 ⏱ 42 min 👁 33 📄 lecture 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

material culturesailors18th centuryarchivesunderwater archaeology

Summary

This presentation, part of the GEMER seminar, explores the material culture of sailors in 18th-century France through two complementary studies. Caroline Bidon analyzes 707 probate inventories from La Rochelle (1739-1759), focusing on clothing, textiles, and personal effects to reveal social hierarchies and the influence of colonial trade. She finds a gradual adoption of aristocratic fashions among officers and the emergence of cotton fabrics, with limited African influence. Denis Leguen combines judicial archives and underwater archaeology from Brittany (late 17th-early 18th century) to examine everyday objects and the conditions of sailors’ engagement. He highlights chronic indebtedness, the role of innkeepers in outfitting sailors, and the adaptability of sailors in reusing materials. The talk emphasizes the importance of critically assessing sources and understanding the social dynamics aboard ships.

126 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The presentation offers valuable insights into the material culture of sailors, using a combination of archival and archaeological sources. Bidon’s quantitative analysis of inventories provides a solid foundation for understanding clothing and textile consumption, while Leguen’s qualitative approach adds depth by contextualizing objects within the social and economic realities of sailors’ lives. The argumentation is well-structured, with clear methodological explanations and critical reflections on source limitations. The authors effectively demonstrate how material culture can reveal social hierarchies, global trade influences, and the daily struggles of maritime workers.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The sources are diverse and well-suited to the research questions: probate inventories, judicial archives, and underwater archaeological finds. The authors show critical awareness of the biases and limitations of each source type, such as the selective nature of inventories and the legal context of judicial records. The title accurately reflects the content, and the presentation maintains a high level of scholarly rigor. The lack of explicit citations in the video is compensated by the detailed description of archival collections and archaeological sites.

184 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the material culture of sailors in 18th-century France.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The presentation is based on archival research and archaeological evidence, with a clear methodology and critical source analysis. However, it is a conference talk without peer review, and some statistical claims are based on limited samples.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Archives départementales de la Charente-Maritime — Probate inventories and judicial records consulted by Caroline Bidon.
  • Fonds d'amirauté de Saint-Malo et de Nantes — Judicial archives used by Denis Leguen.
  • Épave de la Dauphine — Underwater archaeological site studied by Denis Leguen.

Concurring Sources

  • The Material Culture of Sailors in the Age of Sail — General scholarly literature on sailors' material culture.

Dissenting Sources

  • None — No discordant sources were mentioned in the video.

Contribution & Novelties

The presentation contributes original insights by combining archival and archaeological evidence to reconstruct the material culture of sailors, highlighting the social dynamics and economic constraints. It challenges simplistic narratives of sailors’ poverty by showing the complexity of their possessions and the influence of global trade.

Pour aller plus loin :

78 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, with moderate technical level and reliability. This indicates a well-researched presentation with strong empirical grounding, though not highly technical in methodology.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.