Séminaire général du CERCRID "Pouvoir présidentiel et covid" - 17 octobre 2025

Séminaire général du CERCRID "Pouvoir présidentiel et covid" - 17 octobre 2025

🎙 Thibault Desmoulins 👥 144 📅 July 3, 2026 ⏱ 126 min 👁 178 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

présidentialismeétat d'urgenceconseil de défensedroit politiquecrise sanitaire

Summary

This seminar, held at the CERCRID laboratory, features Thibault Desmoulins presenting his book “Pouvoir présidentiel et covid” (Presidential Power and Covid). The session begins with an introduction by Grégory, who highlights Desmoulins’ academic background and his work on the concept of arbitrariness. Desmoulins then outlines his research journey, starting from the observation of a concentration of presidential decisions during the health crisis. He identifies three main areas of investigation: the legal basis of presidential power, the classification of emergency measures, and the genealogy of crisis law. He argues that the Covid crisis has transformed the French presidentialism from a political to a legal nature, a shift he terms “présidentialisme juridique.” The discussant, Agathe Faranda, raises questions about the impact on democracy, the relationship with science, and the methodological implications for legal research. Desmoulins responds by addressing these concerns, emphasizing the need to look beyond formal constitutional texts to understand actual power dynamics. The seminar concludes with a discussion on the state of democracy and the role of legal scholarship.

169 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in its detailed analysis of the constitutional and legal aspects of the Covid crisis in France, offering a novel perspective on presidential power. The argumentation is solid, grounded in legal theory and historical context, and the author engages critically with existing categories. The discussion adds depth by challenging the author’s thesis and exploring broader implications for democracy.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The seminar demonstrates scientific rigor through its academic setting, the author’s expertise, and the critical engagement of the discussant. Sources are not explicitly cited in the video, but the discussion references legal concepts and works such as Levitsky and Ziblatt’s “How Democracies Die.” The title accurately reflects the content, and the presentation is well-structured.

132 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a seminar on presidential power during the Covid crisis, centered on the book by Thibault Desmoulins.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The seminar features a legal scholar presenting his published work, with a discussant and Q&A. The content is grounded in constitutional law and political science, referencing specific legal concepts and historical context. The discussion is academic and critical, though it reflects the author's interpretive framework.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Pouvoir présidentiel et covid. Crise sanitaire et mutation institutionnelle de la Vème République — The book by Thibault Desmoulins, which is the main subject of the seminar.
  • How Democracies Die — Referenced by the discussant as a comparative work on democratic backsliding.

Concurring Sources

  • How Democracies Die — The discussant references this book to raise concerns about democratic decline, which aligns with the seminar's critical perspective.

Contribution & Novelties

The seminar provides an original analysis of the Covid crisis as a constitutional moment, arguing that it accelerated a shift in French presidentialism from a political to a legal nature. This perspective challenges traditional views and offers a new framework for understanding executive power. The discussion also highlights the importance of looking beyond formal legal texts to grasp actual power dynamics.

Pour aller plus loin :

94 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level, indicating a well-balanced and accessible academic discussion.

Reliability 8/10