Webinaire : Mesurer les financements du développement et des biens publics mondiaux

Webinaire : Mesurer les financements du développement et des biens publics mondiaux

🎙 Fondation FERDI 👥 2K 📅 July 16, 2026 ⏱ 95 min 👁 161 📄 debate 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

development financeglobal public goodsTOSSDclimate financeAI

Summary

This webinar, organized by FERDI, is the third in a series on reconciling international development finance and global public goods. The focus is on measurement methodologies. Serge Tomasi introduces the rationale for distinguishing development finance from global public goods finance, highlighting differences in beneficiaries and the principle of additionality. He proposes a practical method based on separating adaptation and mitigation finance. Tomas Hos presents analytical work showing that mitigation finance within ODA tends to favor middle-income countries and less vulnerable nations, and explains how TOSSD captures mitigation finance across its three pillars. Xubei Luo discusses using AI and machine learning to reclassify aid data from the OECD’s Creditor Reporting System, creating more granular categories and identifying emerging trends. Désiré Vencatachellum, drawing on his experience at the African Development Bank, discusses the practical use of these metrics for resource mobilization. The discussion underscores the complexity of measuring finance flows with multiple objectives and the need for improved metrics.

157 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides valuable insights into the challenges of measuring development finance and global public goods. The speakers present concrete data and methodologies, such as the TOSSD framework and AI-based classification, which are innovative and relevant. The argumentation is solid, with each speaker supporting their points with empirical evidence or institutional experience. The discussion is balanced, acknowledging both the strengths and limitations of current measurement systems.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The webinar demonstrates scientific rigor through the use of official data sources (OECD, TOSSD) and references to specific papers. The sources are credible and well-integrated into the discussion. The title accurately reflects the content, which is focused on measurement issues. The panelists are experts from reputable institutions, enhancing the reliability of the information presented.

135 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on measuring development finance and global public goods.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The webinar features recognized experts from international institutions (OECD, World Bank, FERDI) and presents data-driven analyses. The discussion is well-structured and references specific methodologies (TOSSD, AI-based classification). However, it is a debate format with no formal peer review, and some claims rely on the speakers' expertise.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • FERDI working paper on development finance and global public goods — Referenced by Serge Tomasi as the basis for his presentation.
  • TOSSD (Total Official Support for Sustainable Development) — Discussed by Tomas Hos as an international measurement framework.
  • OECD Creditor Reporting System — Mentioned as the primary data source for aid statistics.

Concurring Sources

  • OECD DAC statistics — Used by multiple speakers to support their analyses.
  • FERDI publications — Papers referenced by Serge Tomasi and others.

Contribution & Novelties

The webinar provides a comprehensive overview of current measurement challenges and proposes innovative solutions, such as the adaptation/mitigation split and AI-based data reclassification. It highlights the need for better metrics to distinguish development finance from global public goods finance.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • TOSSD — Official website for the TOSSD framework.
  • OECD DAC statistics — Source of aid data used in the discussion.
  • World Bank Open Data — For additional development finance data.

74 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level. This indicates a well-informed and credible discussion, though not overly technical, making it accessible to a broader audience.

Reliability 8/10